« Previous
Next »
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 88
, Pages S4-S13
, May 2007
Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: Discharge and 6-month outcomes from a prospective matching study
References
- . New scales to assess change in the Addiction Severity Index for the opioid, cocaine, and alcohol dependent. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 1998;12:233–246
- . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed., text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000;
- . The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 2nd ed.. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson; 1998;
- . Research on drug courts: a critical review. Natl. Drug Court Inst. Rev. 1998;1:1–42
- . Research on drug courts: a critical review: 1999 update. Natl. Drug Court Inst. Rev. 1999;2:1–58
- . Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review: 2001 Update. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia Univ.; 2001;
- . Test-retest reliability of the lifetime items on the addiction severity index. Psychol. Assess. 1999;11:86–93
- . A conseptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science. 2004;5:185–196
- . Secondary prevention services for clients who are low risk in drug court: a conceptual model. Crime Delinquency. 2006;52:114–134
- . Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994;
- . Expungement of arrest records in drug court: Do clients know what they’re missing?. Drug Court Rev. 2005;5:1–21
- . Status hearings in drug court: when more is less and less is more. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;68:151–157
- . Assessing cost off-sets in a drug court setting. Natl. Drug Court Inst. Rev. 1999;2:59–91
- . Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press; 1997;
- . A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology. 1996;34:575–596
- . Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. J. Drug Issues. 2001;31:27–72
- . SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1996;
- . A sober assessment of drug courts. Fed. Sent. Rep. 2003;16:153–157
- . Are judicial status hearings a “key component” of drug court? Six and twelve months outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79:145–155
- . The role of judicial status hearings in drug court. Offender Subst. Abuse Rep. 2003;3:33–46
- . The judge is a key component of drug court. Drug Court Rev. 2004;4:1–34
- . Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime Delinquency. 2006;52:52–76
- . Are judicial status hearings a key component of drug court? During-treatment data from a randomized trial. Crim. Justice Behav. 2003;30:141–162
- . Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: Lessons from behavioral research. Natl. Drug Court Inst. Rev. 1999;2:1–31
- . Amenability to treatment of drug offenders. Fed. Probation. 2003;67:40–46
- . Construct refinement and confirmation for the addiction severity index. Psychol. Assess. 1996;8:182–189
- . The fifth edition of the addiction severity index: cautions, additions and normative data. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1992;9:461–480
- . New data from the addiction severity index: reliability and validity in three centers. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1985;173:412–423
- . An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse clients: the addiction severity index. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1980;168:26–33
- . An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat. Med. 2005;24:1455–1481
- . Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, US Dept. of Justice; 1997;
- . Predictors of retention and arrest in drug court. Natl. Drug Court Inst. Rev. 1999;2:33–60
- . SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 8.02. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2001;
- . Drug Treatment: The Case for Coercion. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute; 1999;
- . Involuntary treatment of substance abuse disorders—impediments to success. Psychiatry. 1989;52:164–176
- Taxman, F.S., Marlowe, D.B. (Eds.), 2006. Risk, needs, responsivity: in action or inaction? [Introduction to special issue]. Crime Delinquency 52, 3–6.
- . Adult Drug Courts: Evidence Indicates Recidivism Reductions and Mixed Results for Other Outcomes [No. GAO-05-219]. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office; 2005;
PII: S0376-8716(06)00366-8
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.001
© 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 88
, Pages S4-S13
, May 2007
