Journal Home
Search for

Volume 84, Issue 1, Page 133 (1 September 2006)


View previous. 15 of 15

Erratum to “The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies” [Drug Alcohol Depend. 67 (2002) 53–72]

Michael L. PrendergastaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Deborah Podusa, Eunice Changb, Darren Uradaa

Refers to article:
The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies
Michael L. Prendergast, Deborah Podus, Eunice Chang, Darren Urada
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
1 June 2002 (Vol. 67, Issue 1, Pages 53-72)
Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (268 KB) | Add-Ons

Article Outline

Copyright

A statement in the above article is incorrect. We stated (pp. 61, 64) that the mean effect size for crime outcomes was larger for programs in which the subject population was younger than for programs in which the subjects were older. Table 4, however, shows a positive relationship between age and the effect size for crime. The information in the table is correct. It should be noted that, within the context of this meta-analysis, age is a program-level, rather than an individual-level, variable. Thus, the finding should not be taken to mean that older clients have better crime outcomes than younger clients. Rather, it should be interpreted to mean that programs with older clients, on average, have somewhat better crime outcomes than programs with younger clients on average.

a Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 1640 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA

b Prescription Solutions, 2300 Main Street, MS CS57-404, Irvine, CA 92614, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 310 445 0874; fax: +1 310 312 0559.

PII: S0376-8716(06)00058-5

doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.002


View previous. 15 of 15