Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 88 , Pages S31-S40 , May 2007

Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: A conceptual introduction

  • Daniel E. Rivera

      Affiliations

    • Control Systems Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-6006, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 480 965 9476; fax: +1 480 965 0037.
    • ,
  • Michael D. Pew

      Affiliations

    • Control Systems Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-6006, United States
    • ,
  • Linda M. Collins

      Affiliations

    • The Methodology Center and Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State University, State College, PA 16801, United States

Received 5 April 2006 ,Revised 12 October 2006 ,Accepted 25 October 2006.

References 

  1. Braun MW, Rivera DE, Carlyle WM, Kempf KG. Application of model predictive control to robust management of multi-echelon demand networks. Simul. Trans. Soc. Model. Simul. Int. 2003;79(3):139–156
  2. Brooner RK, Kidorf M. Using behavioral reinforcement to improve methadone treatment participation. Sci. Practice Perspect. 2002;1:38–48
  3. Brosilow C, Joseph B. Techniques of Model-Based Control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2002;
  4. Camacho EF, Bordons C. Model Predictive Control. London: Springer-Verlag; 1999;
  5. Collins LM, Graham J. The effect of the timing and spacing of observations in longitudinal studies of tobacco and other drug use: temporal design considerations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;68:S85–S96
  6. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KL. A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev. Sci. 2004;5(3):185–196
  7. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, Strecher VJ. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann. Behav. Med. 2005;30:65–73
  8. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group . A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorders: the fast track program. Dev. Psychopathol. 1992;4:509–527
  9. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group . Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1999;67:631–647
  10. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group . Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: II. Classroom effects. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1999;67:648–657
  11. Glasgow M, Engel B, D’Lugoff B. A controlled study of a standardized behavioral stepped treatment for hypertension. Psychosom. Med. 1989;51:10–26
  12. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. 2nd ed.. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1999;
  13. Ljung L, Glad T. Modeling of Dynamic Systems. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1994;
  14. MC-DATS, 2004. Methodological challenges in developing adaptive treatment strategies. http://neuromancer.eecs.umich.edu/dtr/twiki/bin/view, accessed on September 18, 2006.
  15. Molenaar P. Dynamic assessment and adaptive optimization of the psychotherapeutic process. Behav. Assess. 1987;9:389–416
  16. Morari M, Zafiriou E. Robust Process Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1989;
  17. Murphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat. Med. 2005;24:1455–1481
  18. Murphy, S.A., McKay, J.R. Winter 2003/Spring 2004. Adaptive treatment strategies: an emerging approach for improving treatment effectiveness. Clinical Science (Newsletter of the American Psychological Association Division 12, section III: The Society for the Science of Clinical Psychology).
  19. Murphy SA, Oslin DW, Rush AJ, Zhu J. Methodological challenges in constructing effective treatment sequences for chronic psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:257–262
  20. Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH. Process Dynamics, Modeling, and Control. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994;
  21. Powers WT. A cognitive control system. In:  Levine RL,  Fitzgerald H editor. Analysis of Dynamic Psychological Systems, vol. 2: Methods and Applications. New York: Plenum Press; 1992;p. 327–340
  22. Prett D, Garcia C. Fundamental Process Control. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth; 1988;
  23. Qin SJ, Badgwell TA. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng. Practice. 2003;11:733–764
  24. Ramsay JO. The control of behavioral input-output systems. In:  Walls T,  Schafer J editor. Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006;p. 176–194
  25. Rivera DE, Morari M, Skogestad S. Internal model control. 4. PID controller design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1986;25:252–265
  26. Rivera, D.E., Pew, M.D., Collins, L.M., Murphy, S.A., 2005. Engineering control approaches for the design and analysis of adaptive, time-varying interventions. The Methodology Center Technical Report 05-73, Pennsylvania State University.
  27. Rosenberg ES, Altfield M, Poon SH, Phillips MN, Wilkes BM, Eldridge RL, et al. Immune control of HIV-1 after early treatment of acute infection. Nature. 2000;407:523–526
  28. Rush AJ, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, Lavori PW, Trivedi MH, Sack-eim HA, et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design. Control. Clin. Trials. 2004;25(1):119–142
  29. Schneider L, Tariot P, Lyketsos C, KS KD, Davis K, Davis S, et al. National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials in Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2001;9:346–360
  30. Schwartz JD, Wang W, Rivera DE. Simulation-based optimization of model predictive control policies for inventory management in supply chains. Automatica. 2006;42(8):1311–1320
  31. Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA. Process Dynamics and Control. 2nd ed.. New York, NY: Wiley; 2004;
  32. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Stepped care for alcohol problems: an efficient method for planning and delivering critical services. In:  Tucker J,  Donovan D,  Marlatt G editor. Changing Addictive Behavior: Bridging Clinical and Public Health Strategies. New York: Guilford Press; 1999;p. 331–343
  33. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Educ. Couns. 1999;36:119–129
  34. Zafra-Cabeza, A., Rivera, D. E., Collins, L. M., Ridao, M. A., Camacho, E. F. 2006 A risk-based model predictive control approach to adaptive interventions in behavioral health. In: IEEE Conference Decision Control, pp. 673–678.

PII: S0376-8716(06)00424-8

doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.020

Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 88 , Pages S31-S40 , May 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution