Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 111, Issue 1 , Pages 21-29, 1 September 2010

The relationship of quality and price of the psychostimulants cocaine and amphetamine with health care outcomes

  • Tibor M. Brunt

      Affiliations

    • Drug Monitoring, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), P.O. Box 725, 3500 VJ, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 30 2959325; fax: +31 30 2971111.
  • ,
  • Margriet van Laar

      Affiliations

    • Drug Monitoring, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Raymond J.M. Niesink

      Affiliations

    • Drug Monitoring, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Wim van den Brink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 13 October 2009; received in revised form 15 February 2010; accepted 25 February 2010.

Abstract 

A major component of the illicit drug market can be subcategorized as the psychostimulant drug market, with cocaine and amphetamine as popular constituents. In The Netherlands, an increase in both health care outcomes addiction treatment and hospital admissions was noted for both amphetamine and cocaine throughout a period of 17 years (1992–2008). Both cocaine price and quality showed a decrease in The Netherlands during the studied period. We used time-series regression analysis to investigate whether price or quality of the drugs were associated with health care outcomes. Drug seizures were also added to the time-series regressions in order to check for possible effects of drug availability and supply. Price and quality of cocaine were strongly associated with health care outcomes of addiction treatment and hospital admissions. Price of amphetamine also showed a decrease during these 17 years, but was associated with an increase in addiction treatment only. Other amphetamine market variables did not show any relationship with the health care outcomes. It could be stated that following basic market logics does not apply equally to all psychostimulants of abuse. Other factors might play a role, such as the addictiveness or desirability of a specific drug in question. This finding is supportive of the dynamics of the illicit psychostimulant market affecting actual use and thereby health care outcomes.

Keywords: Amphetamine, Cocaine, Price, Purity, Adulteration, Health care outcomes, Hospital admissions, Time-series regression analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0376-8716(10)00114-6

doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.023

Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 111, Issue 1 , Pages 21-29, 1 September 2010