Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 111, Issue 1 , Pages 44-49, 1 September 2010

Injection of buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in Malaysia

  • B. Vicknasingam

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Drug Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +60 4 6532140; fax: +60 4 6568669.
  • ,
  • M. Mazlan

      Affiliations

    • Substance Abuse Research Centre, Muar, Johor 84000, Malaysia
  • ,
  • R.S. Schottenfeld

      Affiliations

    • Yale University School of Medicine, CMHC/SAC, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
  • ,
  • M.C. Chawarski

      Affiliations

    • Yale University School of Medicine, CMHC/SAC, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519, USA

Received 7 December 2009; received in revised form 16 March 2010; accepted 16 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Buprenorphine maintenance is efficacious for treating opioid dependence, but problems with diversion and misuse of buprenorphine (BUP) may limit its acceptability and dissemination. The buprenorphine/naloxone combination tablet (BNX) was developed to reduce potential problems with diversion and abuse. This paper provides data regarding the characteristics of BUP injection drug users in Malaysia and preliminary data regarding the impact of withdrawing BUP and introducing BNX. BUP was introduced in 2002 and subsequently withdrawn from the Malaysian market in 2006. BNX was introduced in 2007.

Methods

A two wave survey of BUP IDUs was conducted shortly prior to BUP withdrawal from the Malaysian market (n=276) and six months after BNX was introduced (n=204). Six focus groups with BUP and/or BNX IDUs were also conducted shortly before the second wave.

Results

In addition to current BUP or BNX IDU, 96% of first wave participants and 97% second wave participants reported lifetime heroin IDU preceding the onset of their BUP/BNX IDU. Additionally, 58% of first and 64% of second wave survey participants reported current heroin IDU. Benzodiazepine abuse, often injected with BUP, was reported in both the surveys. Focus group participants reported that BNX was not as desirable as BUP, nonetheless, the results of the second wave survey suggest a continuing widespread BNX IDU, at least in Kuala Lumpur.

Conclusions

In Malaysia, BUP and BNX IDU occur among heroin IDUs. The introduction of BNX and withdrawal of BUP may have helped to reduce, but did not eliminate the problems with diversion and abuse.

Keywords: Buprenorphine, Buprenorphine naloxone, Injection drug use, HIV and infectious disease risk factors, Malaysia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0376-8716(10)00133-X

doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.03.014

Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume 111, Issue 1 , Pages 44-49, 1 September 2010