Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 134, 1 January 2014, Pages 391-395
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Short communication
Achieving smoking abstinence is associated with decreased cocaine use in cocaine-dependent patients receiving smoking-cessation treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Past research suggests that a significant relationship exists between cigarette smoking and illicit-stimulant abuse. The present study evaluated the association between achieving smoking abstinence in response to smoking-cessation treatment (SCT) and illicit-stimulant abstinence in cocaine- and/or methamphetamine-dependent participants.

Methods

Secondary analysis of a randomized, 10-week trial conducted at 12 substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs. Two hundred and sixty seven adults, meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for cocaine and/or methamphetamine-dependence and interested in quitting smoking were randomized to SUD treatment as usual plus SCT consisting of weekly individual smoking cessation counseling, extended-release (XL) bupropion (300 mg/day), nicotine inhaler, and contingency management for smoking abstinence. Illicit-stimulant-abstinence was measured by self-report and urine drug screens. Smoking abstinence was assessed via self-report and carbon monoxide levels.

Results

A significant effect was found for the cocaine-dependent subsample (N = 147) in which participants who stopped smoking were abstinent for illicit stimulants an average of 78.2% of the post-smoking-quit weeks (weeks 4–10) relative to 63.6% in participants who continued smoking (X2(1) = 8.55, p < .01, d = 0.36). No significant effects were found for the sample as a whole (N = 249) or for the methamphetamine-dependent subsample (N = 102).

Conclusions

The present results suggest that cocaine-dependent patients achieving smoking abstinence in response to SCT might evidence not only improved smoking outcomes but improved cocaine-use outcomes as well. Future research to replicate this finding appears warranted.

Introduction

A link between cigarette smoking and cocaine abuse has been established in pre-clinical, human laboratory, and clinical studies. In mice, exposure to nicotine prior to cocaine increases behaviors associated with cocaine and results in synaptic changes in the striatum and amygdala that are not associated with nicotine or cocaine alone (Huang et al., 2013, Levine et al., 2011). Pre-treatment of rhesus monkeys with nicotine prior to cocaine enhances the preference for cocaine (Mello and Newman, 2011) while the combination of nicotine and cocaine results in greater drug administration than either substance alone (Mello et al., 2013, Mello and Newman, 2011). Human laboratory studies have found that cocaine administration increases the rate of cigarette smoking (Nemeth-Coslett et al., 1986, Roll et al., 1997) and that mecamylamine, a nicotine antagonist, reduces cue-induced cocaine craving (Reid et al., 1999) while nicotine increases it (Reid et al., 1998).

Clinically, the rates of cocaine dependence are significantly higher in cocaine users who initiated cocaine after having started smoking compared to both non-smokers and those who initiated cocaine before smoking (Levine et al., 2011). The rate of smoking in cocaine abusers is 75–80% (Budney et al., 1993, Gorelick et al., 1997, Sees and Clark, 1993) and smoking cigarettes is associated with more severe cocaine addiction, including more frequent cocaine use, a greater likelihood of injecting or smoking cocaine, and more severe employment and legal difficulties (Budney et al., 1993, Roll et al., 1997). In addition, smoking status is a significant predictor of cocaine use (Frosch et al., 2000, Patkar et al., 2003, Roll et al., 1996) and cocaine users who smoke concurrently smoke more cigarettes (Brewer et al., 2013, Roll et al., 1996) and experience greater cravings for both nicotine and cocaine (Brewer et al., 2013).

A smaller body of research also suggests that there is a connection between methamphetamine use and cigarette smoking. In rats, co-administration of nicotine and methamphetamine results in expression of different genes in the brain than those expressed when either drug is administered alone (Saint-Preux et al., 2013). It has been suggested that nicotine and methamphetamine may substitute for each other, to some extent (Gatch et al., 2008, Hiranita et al., 2006). In nicotine-naïve rats, nicotine priming alone reinstates methamphetamine-seeking, though to a lesser degree than methamphetamine-priming and cue-induction (Hiranita et al., 2006). In contrast, Neugebauer and colleagues (2010) found that nicotine priming reinstated methamphetamine-seeking only in rats that had been previously treated with nicotine rather than saline. In humans, a laboratory study found that d-amphetamine dose-dependently increases cigarette smoking (Tidey et al., 2000). A secondary analysis of a clinical trial of bupropion for methamphetamine dependence revealed a positive association between number of cigarettes smoked and methamphetamine use, but only in the placebo group (Brensilver et al., 2013). The high prevalence of smoking in methamphetamine abusers, estimated to be over 87% (Grant et al., 2007, Weinberger and Sofuoglu, 2009), also suggests a link between cigarette smoking and methamphetamine use.

Given the link between illicit stimulant use and cigarette smoking, we have hypothesized that better illicit stimulant-use outcomes would be obtained for stimulant-dependent patients who achieved smoking cessation abstinence in response to smoking-cessation treatment (Winhusen et al., 2012a). The data to test this hypothesis came from a recent multi-site trial conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) which evaluated the impact of concurrent substance use disorder (SUD) and nicotine dependence treatment for cocaine and/or methamphetamine-dependent patients who were also nicotine dependent. The primary analyses from the trial revealed that there were no significant treatment effects on stimulant-use outcomes (Winhusen et al., 2013). The present analyses evaluated the association between achieving smoking abstinence and illicit-stimulant abstinence in the post-smoking-quit phase of the study for participants randomized to the smoking-cessation condition. Because there are important differences between cocaine and methamphetamine (Newton et al., 2005, Winhusen et al., 2013a, Winhusen et al., 2013b), we evaluated the association for the entire sample as well as separately for the cocaine-dependent and methamphetamine-dependent participants.

Section snippets

Study design

Details of the trial are provided elsewhere (Winhusen et al., 2012a). Briefly, the study was a 10-week, intent-to-treat, 2-group randomized controlled trial with follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months post-smoking quit date conducted at 12 SUD outpatient treatment programs. Treatment programs which did not provide smoking-cessation treatment were eligible to participate. Eligible participants were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU with smoking-cessation treatment (TAU + SCT). During the

Results

Demographic and baseline characteristics for the participants are provided in Table 1. The association between smoking abstinence and illicit stimulant abstinence was evaluated for the pooled sample and for the subsets of cocaine-dependent and methamphetamine-dependent participants. As can be seen in Table 2, the results revealed a significant difference only for the cocaine-dependent subsample in which participants who stopped smoking were abstinent for illicit stimulants an average of 78.2%

Discussion

The present study evaluated the association between smoking abstinence and illicit-stimulant abstinence in cocaine- and/or methamphetamine-dependent participants receiving smoking-cessation treatment. The results revealed a significant association for the cocaine-dependent participants with no significant differences for the sample as a whole or for the methamphetamine-dependent participants.

The present results are consistent with a fairly substantial literature finding a significant

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network: U10-DA013732 to University of Cincinnati (Dr. Winhusen); U10-DA020036 to University of Pittsburgh (Dr. Daley), U10-DA013720 to University of Miami School of Medicine (Drs. Szapocznik and Metsch); U10-DA013045 to University of California Los Angeles (Dr. Ling); U10-DA013727 to Medical University of South Carolina (Dr. Brady); U10-DA020024 to University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Contributors

Dr. Winhusen conceptualized the research hypotheses, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, and led the drafting of the manuscript. Mr. Lewis conducted analyses and critically reviewed the manuscript. Ms. Kropp and Mr. Theobald contributed to the interpretation of the findings and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT01077024.

References (39)

  • F. Saint-Preux et al.

    Chronic co-administration of nicotine and methamphetamine causes differential expression of immediate early genes in the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens of rats

    Neuroscience

    (2013)
  • K.L. Sees et al.

    When to begin smoking cessation in substance-abusers

    J. Subst. Abuse Treat.

    (1993)
  • T. Winhusen et al.

    Impulsivity is associated with treatment non-completion in cocaine- and methamphetamine-dependent patients but differs in nature as a function of stimulant-dependence diagnosis

    J. Subst. Abuse Treat.

    (2013)
  • T. Winhusen et al.

    Design considerations for a study to evaluate the impact of smoking cessation treatment on stimulant use outcomes in stimulant-dependent individuals

    Contemp. Clin. Trials

    (2012)
  • T. Winhusen et al.

    The potential impact of recruitment method on sample characteristics and treatment outcomes in a psychosocial trial for women with co-occurring substance use disorder and PTSD

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2012)
  • M. Brensilver et al.

    Cigarette smoking as a target for potentiating outcomes for methamphetamine abuse treatment

    Drug Alcohol Rev.

    (2013)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses – United States, 2000–2004

    MMWR

    (2008)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    (1988)
  • W. Fals-Stewart et al.

    The timeline followback reports of psychoactive substance use by drug abusing patients: psychometric properties

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Associations of tobacco cigarette use and dependence with substance use disorder treatment completion by sex/gender and race/ethnicity

      2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Successful SUD treatment completion is associated with a range of important SUD- and psychosocial-related outcomes including greater odds of substance abstinence, fewer substance use relapses, lower rates of criminal recidivism, higher rates of employment, and higher wages earned (TOPPS-II Interstate Cooperative Study Group, 2003; Brewer et al., 1998; Brorson et al., 2013; Messina et al., 2000). Individuals who smoke cigarettes appear to have poorer outcomes in quitting alcohol and other drugs of abuse compared to those who do not smoke (Haney et al., 2013; Harrell et al., 2011; Mannelli et al., 2013; Peters et al., 2012; Winhusen, Brigham, et al., 2014; Winhusen, Kropp, et al., 2014). More, individuals who smoked, versus did not smoke, cigarettes were less likely to achieve abstinence from alcohol and other drugs during a clinical trial of SUD treatment (McClure et al., 2015).

    • Impact of quitting smoking and smoking cessation treatment on substance use outcomes: An updated and narrative review

      2017, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Five were among SUD treatment seeking samples (Lisha et al., 2014; Winhusen et al., 2014; Campbell et al., 2009; Myers & Prochaska, 2008; Fu et al., 2008), three were among adolescents (Campbell et al., 2009; Myers & Prochaska, 2008; Brook et al., 2007), two in general population samples (Stahre et al., 2013; Brook et al., 2007), one among a smoking-cessation treatment-seeking (but not SUD treatment seeking) sample, and three among high-needs populations (an HIV clinic sample (of HIV + patients), a homeless smokers sample, and a sample of smokers in mental health outpatient treatment). While all nine reported at least one substance use outcome that was not impacted, eight reported at least one substance use outcome that was positively impacted (Prochaska et al., 2008; Lisha et al., 2014; Reitzel et al., 2014; Winhusen et al., 2014; Campbell et al., 2009; Stahre et al., 2013; Myers & Prochaska, 2008; Brook et al., 2007), and only one reported a negatively impacted substance use outcome (Fu et al., 2008). Considering substance use outcomes, six reported alcohol-specific outcomes (either alone or in combination with other substance use outcomes), three of which had findings both positive and null for the same alcohol-specific outcomes, two had findings of positive impact, and one reported no impact.

    • A Randomized Trial of Contingency Management for Smoking Cessation During Intensive Outpatient Alcohol Treatment

      2017, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      This study also explored the effect of the CM smoking intervention and the effect of smoking abstinence on alcohol and drug abstinence during and after the CM intervention. Based on results of other concurrent tobacco and substance treatment studies (Cooney et al., 2015; Lisha, Carmody, Humfleet, & Delucchi, 2014; Shoptaw et al., 2002; Winhusen, Kropp, Theobald, & Lewis, 2014), we predicted that smoking abstinence at the end of treatment would be associated with alcohol and drug abstinence. Participants were recruited after admission to a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) intensive outpatient substance use treatment program.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text