Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 152, 1 July 2015, Pages 68-72
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

A reexamination of medical marijuana policies in relation to suicide risk

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Prior research suggested that medical marijuana policies lead to reduced suicide risk.

  • We attempted to update, replicate and extend this research.

  • We found no association between medical marijuana policies and suicide risk.

  • The difference is likely explained by additional covariates in the newer analyses.

  • It is unlikely that medical marijuana policies reduce suicide risk.

Abstract

Objectives

Previous research has suggested that medical marijuana policies lead to reductions in suicide rates. In this study, we further investigate the association between these policies and within-state changes in suicide risk.

Methods

Data on suicide deaths (n = 662,993) from the National Vital Statistics System Multiple Cause of Death files were combined with living population data. Fixed-effects regression methods were employed to control for state differences in suicide rates and national and state secular trends. Analyses extended prior research that suggested a protective effect of medical marijuana policies by incorporating newer data and additional covariates.

Results

After adjustment for race/ethnicity, tobacco control policies, and other covariates, we found no association between medical marijuana policy and suicide risk in the population ages 15 and older (OR = 1.000; 95% CI: 0.956, 1.045; p = 0.98), among men overall (OR = 0.996; 95% CI: 0.951, 1.043; p = 0.87) or for any other age-by-sex groups.

Conclusion

We find no statistically significant association between medical marijuana policy and suicide risk. These results contradict prior analyses which did not control for race/ethnicity and certain state characteristics such as tobacco control policies. Failure to control for these factors in future analyses would likely bias estimates of the associations between medical marijuana policy and health outcomes.

Introduction

Over the past two decades, 23 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical use in the U.S. (Anderson et al., 2014, Pacula et al., 2013). These policies were adopted at different times, allowing researchers to analyze the effects of policy changes as a natural experiment: differences in medical marijuana policies between states over time allow investigators to draw inferences about whether policy that could facilitate access to marijuana are causally associated with key public health outcomes (Anderson et al., 2013, Anderson et al., 2014, Cerdá et al., 2012, Choo et al., 2014, Gorman and Charles Huber, 2007, Harper et al., 2012, Lynne-Landsman et al., 2013, Pacula et al., 2013, Rylander et al., 2014, Schuermeyer et al., 2014, Wall et al., 2011). In one of the more intriguing examples of such a study, Anderson and colleagues examined the association between legalization of medical marijuana and changes in state suicide rates over the period 1990–2007 (Anderson et al., 2014). Their results suggested that legalization of medical marijuana led to a decrease in suicide rates. Specifically, they reported that legalization was associated with a 5% decrease in the suicide rate for men overall, about a 10% decrease in the suicide rate of men aged 20 through 29, and a nearly 14% decrease in men aged 30 through 39.

If the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes truly leads to reductions in suicide rates, this would have important implications for public health and policy. Suicide is among the ten leading causes of death in the United States and the 4th leading contributor to years of potential life lost among people under 65 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, Murphy et al., 2013). Any true effect on suicide rates should be seriously considered in the policy debates surrounding both medical and recreational marijuana. However, a protective effect against suicide is surprising given that neurodevelopmental and psychiatric effects—including suicide risk—are among the primary health concerns associated with regular marijuana use (Batalla et al., 2013, Hall and Degenhardt, 2009, Meier et al., 2012, Moore et al., 2007, Price et al., 2009, Van Ours et al., 2013, Volkow et al., 2014). Given the relevance of such a finding to policy, the suggestion that medical marijuana policies might lead to lower rates of suicide warrants closer scrutiny.

In the present study, we sought to extend the work exploring the association between medical marijuana policy and reduced suicide risk (Anderson et al., 2014). We utilized data from individual death records, which allowed us to adjust for demographic variables at an individual level. This was not possible in the prior study, which analyzed state suicide rates instead of individual death records. Yet adjusting for demographic variables could be important because they may be associated with suicide rates, and, as key characteristics of state electorates, could influence state policy change. For example, race and educational attainment, which were not addressed in the prior study, are well known to be associated with suicide rates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2013, Crosby et al., 2013, Crosby et al., 2011). We also adjusted for several additional state policies and characteristics that past research suggests could be relevant. For example, we have recently shown that state tobacco control policies may influence suicide risk (Grucza et al., 2014). Tobacco control policies also likely influence the prevalence of marijuana use (Chaloupka et al., 1999, Farrelly et al., 2001, Williams et al., 2004), and may influence alcohol use which could be an important determinant of suicide risk (Kaplan et al., 2014, Krauss et al., 2014, Young-Wolff et al., 2013a, Young-Wolff et al., 2013b). We also included measures of state political orientation, per-capita mental health spending, and health insurance coverage, all of which may be associated with suicide risk (Kposowa, 2013, Tondo et al., 2006, Yoon and Bruckner, 2009) and are plausibly related to state policy environments. If these factors changed concurrently with adoption of medical marijuana policy, lack of explicit control for them could lead to biased estimates of the association between medical marijuana policy and suicide. Finally, we incorporated more recent data into our analyses, reflecting newly adopted state medical marijuana policies.

Section snippets

Overview

As an initial step, we conducted analyses comparable to those used in the prior report on medical marijuana policy and suicide, employing data from the same time period and including the same set of covariates (Anderson et al., 2014). However, our analyses utilized individual-level data modeled via logistic regression, whereas the previous report described the association between log-transformed state-level suicides rates modeled from aggregated data using linear regression. Because of these

Results

Initial analyses examined the association between medical marijuana policies and suicide risk over the period 1990–2007 to allow for comparison with results obtained by Anderson et al. (2014). Model development is described in Table S1 (see Supplemental Material); results are shown in Tables S2 and S3 (see Supplemental Material). Similar to the prior results, medical marijuana policies exhibited a significant protective association among men overall, and among the 20–29 and 30–39 year age

Discussion

In this report, we show that the association between state medical marijuana policy and suicide risk was not statistically significant, nor even suggestive of a protective effect, after adjustment for key covariates. Though an earlier report demonstrated an apparent correspondence between the legalization of medical marijuana and a decrease in suicide rates among men (Anderson et al., 2014), incorporation of demographic variables and additional state characteristics into the regression models

Role of the funding source

The authors are responsible for the content; the NIH played no role in the development of this content aside from funding.

Contributors

Richard A. Grucza conceived and designed the study, conducted analyses, and led writing of the manuscript. Michael Hur and Melissa J. Krauss conducted analyses and critically reviewed the manuscript. Arpana Agrawal and Andrew D. Plunk drafted portions of the manuscript and critically reviewed it. Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg critically reviewed the manuscript. Frank J. Chaloupka advised on analyses and critically reviewed the manuscript. Laura J. Bierut advised on the interpretation of the data and

Conflicts of interest

L.J.B. is listed as an inventor on Issued U.S. Patent 8,080,371,“Markers for Addiction” covering the use of certain genetic polymorphisms in determining the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of addiction.

References (48)

  • K.C. Young-Wolff et al.

    Smoke-free policies in drinking venues predict transitions in alcohol use disorders in a longitudinal U.S. sample

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2013)
  • D.M. Anderson et al.

    Medical marijuana laws, traffic fatalities, and alcohol consumption

    J. Law Econ.

    (2013)
  • D.M. Anderson et al.

    Medical marijuana laws and suicides by gender and age

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2014)
  • J.D. Angrist et al.

    Mostly Harmless Econometrics: an Empiricist's Companion

    (2008)
  • A. Batalla et al.

    Structural and functional imaging studies in chronic cannabis users: a systematic review of adolescent and adult findings

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • W.D. Berry et al.

    Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93

    Am. J. Pol. Sci.

    (1998)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

    (2014)
  • Suicide among adults aged 35–64 years—United States, 1999–2010

    MMWR Rep.

    (2013)
  • F.J. Chaloupka et al.

    Do Higher Cigarette Prices Encourage Youth to Use Marijuana? (Working Paper No. 6939)

    (1999)
  • Chriqui, J.F., 2013. Personal communication (February,...
  • A.E. Crosby et al.

    Suicides—United States, 1999–2007

    MMWR

    (2011)
  • A.E. Crosby et al.

    Suicides—United States, 2005–2009

    MMWR

    (2013)
  • Fording, R.C., 2014. State Ideology Data. https://rcfording.wordpress.com/state-ideology-data/ (accessed...
  • R.A. Grucza et al.

    The legacy of minimum legal drinking age law changes: long-term effects on suicide and homicide deaths among women

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Changes in alcohol and cigarette consumption in response to medical and recreational cannabis legalization: Evidence from U.S. state tax receipt data

      2020, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      This suggests that critical time-varying differences exist in factors that influence alcohol and cigarette consumption in states with liberalized cannabis policies compared to those with prohibitive policies. Prior work has also shown that the apparent effects of medical cannabis policy on health outcomes can be highly sensitive to the choice of covariates (Grucza et al., 2015). Our post hoc analyses identified two such factors that are associated with cigarette consumption: age distribution of state-populations and smoke-free air policies.

    • The impact of adolescent exposure to medical marijuana laws on high school completion, college enrollment and college degree completion

      2016, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      We assume that any potential changes in educational attainment in response to MMLs are due to changes in marijuana use, either at the individual level or in aggregate, but we do not propose that the impact of MMLs on either adolescent use or education are immediate—this process could take years to develop. While MML implementation is associated with changes in the demographic makeup of a state (Grucza et al., 2015), which we explicitly control for by including individual-level sex and race/ethnicity in our models, changes in marijuana policy likely occur independently of many other individual-level correlates of marijuana use. To the degree that this is true, any decreases in educational attainment resulting after MML adoption also provide indirect support for a link between marijuana use and lower educational attainment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text