Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 152, 1 July 2015, Pages 39-46
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The effects of Present Hedonistic Time Perspective and Past Negative Time Perspective on substance use consequences

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • PrHTP is associated with substance use consequences.

  • PaNTP is associated with substance use consequences.

  • An indirect effect of PaNTP on substance use consequences through PrHTP was found.

  • We found a connection between time perspective and consequential substance use.

Abstract

Background

The overuse of substances can lead to economic, physical, and social consequences. Previous research has demonstrated associations between time perspective and frequency of substance use, but no studies have investigated time perspective's effect on substance use consequences. This study aimed to fill this gap in the literature.

Methods

Using an MTurk sample (N = 531), latent factor models tested the hypothesis that both Present Hedonistic Time Perspective (PrHTP) and Past Negative Time Perspective PaNTP positively predict alcohol and illicit drug use consequences. Bootstrap analyses were then used to test the hypothesis that PrHTP indirectly affected the relationship between PaNTP and alcohol and illicit drug use consequences.

Results

PrHTP significantly predicted alcohol and illicit drug use consequences. PaNTP also significantly predicted alcohol and illicit drug use consequences. PrHTP was found to indirectly affect the relationship between PaNTP and substance use consequences for both alcohol and illicit drugs.

Conclusions

The findings are consistent with previous research and introduce time perspective as an individual differences risk factor for substance use consequences. The partial and full indirect effects are consistent with the idea that individuals with a PaNTP may develop a PrHTP, placing them at risk for substance use consequences.

Introduction

Problematic substance use results in significant costs to society. Among individuals in the U.S. aged 12 and older, approximately 21.6 million (8.2% of the population aged 12 and older) suffer from a substance use disorder, with 17.3 million having a diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence and 6.9 having an illicit drug abuse or dependence diagnosis (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013). The excessive use of substances can lead to health, familial, economic, and legal consequences (see Chen and Lin, 2009, Rehm et al., 2009, Room et al., 2005, Stuart et al., 2008). For instance, Rehm et al. (2009) found that the U.S. spent approximately 2.7% of its gross domestic product on alcohol associated economic costs (e.g., health costs, law-enforcement costs). The United States Department of Justice (2010) also found that illicit drug use costs the United States an estimated $193 billion in similar expenses. The considerable costs that result from alcohol and illicit drug abuse highlight the need to identify factors that lead to substance use consequences. In doing so, nascent areas of intervention may be identified that could help curb or prevent these costly consequences.

One such factor that has been found to predict risky behaviors, including substance use, is time perspective. Time perspective is a temporally stable individual differences construct that influences the perception of and focus on past, present, or future events (Gonzalez and Zimbardo, 1985, Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999). It is believed that individuals with a high present time perspective focus their attention on what is currently happening in their lives and are less inclined to forecast into the future or relive the past. Those with a high past time perspective tend to relive or perseverate on past events. Finally, individuals with a high future time perspective tend to forecast what may happen in the future. Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) have proposed the existence of five distinct time perspectives that compose these three higher order time perspectives: Past Negative, Past Positive, Present Hedonistic, Present Fatalistic, and Future. They posit that a balanced time orientation “allows individuals to flexibly switch temporal frames among past, future, and present depending on situational demands, resource assessments, or personal and social appraisals” (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999, p. 1272).

Studies investigating the higher order constructs of time perspective have found individuals with a high present time perspective to be more likely to participate in activities such as risky driving (Zimbardo et al., 1997) and gambling (Hodgins and Engel, 2002) and to have a higher number of sexual partners (Rothspan and Read, 1996). Consistent with this and most relevant for the present report, researchers have found positive associations between substance use and present time perspective (Keough et al., 1999, Petry et al., 1998, Wills et al., 2001). Research investigating the lower order constructs of time perspective has also found associations with substance use. Specifically, studies have found Present Hedonistic Time Perspective (PrHTP) to be positively associated with substance use (Henson et al., 2006, Petry et al., 1998). Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) define PrHTP as an “orientation towards the pleasures of the present without taking into account the possible future consequences” (p. 1275). Accordingly, individuals with a high PrHTP may be more likely to act on impulse and give little thought to the possible future ramifications of their actions (i.e., compulsive gamblers, over-eaters, problematic substance users).

Whereas an orientation towards the present may increase substance use through impulsive reward seeking, an orientation towards the past may also affect substance-related pursuit. Past Negative Time Perspective (PaNTP) is a negative, antipathetic, and ruminative orientation towards the past and people high on this trait are believed to be sullen and overwhelmingly preoccupied with negative past experiences. Although there is a dearth of literature investigating the association between PaNTP and substance use, the associations between related constructs and substance use provides indirect support for such a relationship. PaNTP is associated with increased levels of stress, arousal, and tension (Stolarski et al., 2013), and there is considerable research linking such constructs characterized by negative affectivity to alcohol and substance use and related problems (Kassel et al., 2000, Takagi et al., 2011, Wills et al., 1999). Given the relationship of PaNTP to negative affect oriented dispositions that have been implicated in alcohol and substance use, PaNTP warrants further exploration as an individual differences factor related to alcohol and drug use.

Much of the prior literature has solely investigated the relationship between time perspective and increased substance use and has ignored consequences resulting from substance use. As research has shown that the escalation of substance use, or the increase in use, is associated with consequences for the user (Colder et al., 2002, Henry, 2010, Henry and Thornberry, 2010), the next important step is to extend the literature by showing a link between time perspective and substance use consequences. Therefore, the first aim of the current study was to establish a connection between PrHTP and substance use consequences. Specifically, it was hypothesized that greater PrHTP scores would be associated with more alcohol and illicit drug use consequences.

The second aim of this study was to establish a relationship between PaNTP and substance use consequences. Research investigating PaNTP has found it to be associated with increased distress and tension (Stolarski et al., 2013, van Beek et al., 2011), which are risk factors for increased substance use (Kushner et al., 1996, Rutledge and Sher, 2001). As research has shown increases in substance use to be associated with more consequences related to substance use, it is important for researchers to understand the role of PaNTP in substance use consequences. This study hypothesized that greater PaNTP scores would be associated with greater alcohol and illicit drug use consequences.

Finally, PaNTP and PrHTP are both related to factors (i.e., negative affect, stress, risky behaviors) that are associated with substance use disorders (Chassin et al., 2004; see Sinha, 2008 for review; Sinha and Li, 2007). Understanding the relationships between PaNTP, PrHTP, and consequences related to substance use will allow researchers to identify time perspective as a possible risk factor for substance use consequences. Given Zimbardo and Boyd's (1999) theory on how time perspective operates and the temporal nature of the PaNTP and PrHTP constructs, this study proposed that individuals with a higher PaNTP may develop a stronger PrHTP in an attempt to alleviate the negative feelings and tension associated with a PaNTP. This reliance on a PrHTP may then expose these individuals to an increased risk for substance use consequences. This study hypothesized that PrHTP would indirectly affect the relationship between PaNTP and substance use consequences.

Section snippets

Participants and procedures

Participants were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk), which is an online crowdsourcing marketplace. Data collected through MTurk has been shown to be diverse and of good quality (Buhrmester et al., 2011, Paolacci and Chandler, 2014). Studies investigating the characteristics of MTurk samples have found that they typically consist of individuals who are overeducated, underemployed, younger (approximately 30 years old), and predominantly Caucasian and middle class (Berinsky et

Descriptive statistics

Descriptive statistics and correlations for PrHTP, PaNTP, alcohol use consequences, drug use consequences, Constraint, alcohol use frequency and quantity, age, and gender (Constraint, alcohol use frequency and quantity, age and gender were used as covariates) are provided in Table 1. Although latent variables were used in all analyses, scale score means were reported to provide statistics comparable to other studies.

Confirmatory factor analyses

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to fit a one-factor model of the

Discussion

This study had three aims. The first was to extend previous work that found positive associations between PrHTP and increased substance use (Henson et al., 2006, Petry et al., 1998) by demonstrating a relationship between PrHTP and substance use consequences. Next, this study attempted to establish a connection between PaNTP and greater substance use consequences, as studies focusing on constructs similar to PaNTP have found such associations with substance use (Kassel et al., 2000, Kushner et

Role of funding source

Nothing declared.

Contributors

Jesus Chavarria—Developed idea, assisted with analyses, and wrote the Introduction, Results, Discussion, and Revisions; Nicholas Allan—Assisted with analyses and provided feedback on drafts and revisions of the manuscript; Allison Moltisanti—Wrote the Methods and provided feedback on drafts and revisions of the manuscript; Jeanette Taylor—Designed larger study from which data were drawn, supervised data collection, and provided feedback on all drafts and revisions of the manuscript; All authors

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared.

References (64)

  • L. Chassin et al.

    Trajectories of alcohol and drug use and dependence from adolescence to adulthood: the effects of familial alcoholism and personality

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (2004)
  • C.Y. Chen et al.

    Health consequences of illegal drug use

    Curr. Opin. Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • F. Chen et al.

    An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models

    Sociol. Method Res.

    (2008)
  • G.W. Cheung et al.

    Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables bootstrapping with structural equation models

    Organ. Res. Methods

    (2008)
  • C.R. Colder et al.

    A finite mixture model of growth trajectories of adolescent alcohol use: predictors and consequences

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • M.A. Cyders et al.

    The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking

    Addiction

    (2009)
  • H.C. Fox et al.

    Ecstacy use: cognitive deficits related to dosage rather than self-reported problematic use of the drug

    J. Psychopharmacol.

    (2001)
  • A. Gonzalez et al.

    Time Perspective: a Psychology Today survey report

    Psychol. Today

    (1985)
  • K.L. Henry

    Academic achievement and adolescent drug use: an examination of reciprocal effects and correlated growth trajectories

    J. Sch. Health

    (2010)
  • K.L. Henry et al.

    Truancy and escalation of substance use during adolescence

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2010)
  • J.M. Henson et al.

    Associations among health behaviors and time perspective in young adults: model testing with boot-strapping replication

    J. Behav. Med.

    (2006)
  • D.C. Hodgins et al.

    Future time perspective in pathological gamblers

    J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.

    (2002)
  • L. Hu et al.

    Fit indeces in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparametereized model misspecification

    Psychol. Methods

    (1998)
  • L. Hu et al.

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives

    Struct. Equ. Model.

    (1999)
  • C. Jacobi et al.

    Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestings for a general taxonomy

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2004)
  • C.W. Kahler et al.

    Validation of the 30-day version of the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire for use in longitudinal studies

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2008)
  • C.W. Kahler et al.

    Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire

    Alchohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2005)
  • J.D. Kassel et al.

    Generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation and problem drinking among college students

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2000)
  • D.A. Kenny et al.

    Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling

    Struct. Equ. Model.

    (2003)
  • K.A. Keough et al.

    Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use

    Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • R.B. Kline

    Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

    (2011)
  • R. Kosara et al.

    Do Mechanical Turks Dream of square pie charts?

  • Cited by (36)

    • Depression and time perspectives in patients with brain tumors: Novel measurements in the circle test

      2021, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the relative of the past perspective was larger in the Dp group than in the NDp group, and the proportion of the future perspective was smaller in the Dp group than in the NDp group. In the literature, a focus on the past has been associated with distress in cancer patients (van Laarhoven et al., 2011), while a predominantly present time perspective has been related to impulsive pleasure-seeking (Chavarria et al., 2015; Rothspan and Read, 1996; Sekścińska et al., 2018; Zimbardo et al., 1997). Therefore, it is possible that changes in the past and present time perspectives are associated with distress or loss of pleasure in depressed patients.

    • Cyberchondria: Overlap with health anxiety and unique relations with impairment, quality of life, and service utilization

      2018, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Eligibility requirements for the current study included living in the United States, being 18 years of age or older, and having a Human Intelligence Task rating greater than 90% indicating a history of high quality work on other Mturk surveys. Additionally, consistent with prior Mturk research (Chavarria et al., 2015; Raines et al., 2015), two validity check items were included as an indicator of random responding (e.g., “Are you reading this questionnaire?”). There were 575 individuals who completed the survey.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text