Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 154, 1 September 2015, Pages 69-75
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The role of neighborhood in urban black adolescent marijuana use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study included longitudinal data from 556 low-income, urban Black adolescents.

  • Three stages of marijuana involvement: no involvement, offers, use and problems.

  • Involvement increased steadily during adolescence.

  • Disorder, drug activity and disadvantage associated with transitions from offers to use.

  • Disorder, drug activity, and violent crime associated with rapidly transitioning to use.

Abstract

Background

The present study examined the influence of neighborhood factors on transitions in marijuana involvement during adolescence in a sample of primarily low-income, urban Black youth.

Methods

556 Black adolescents were interviewed annually beginning in first grade as part of a longitudinal study. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to examine stages of marijuana involvement from 6th to 9th grades. The influence of neighborhood disorder, drug activity, violent crime, safety and disadvantage on transitions in marijuana involvement was tested using latent transition analysis (LTA).

Results

There was evidence for three stages of involvement: no involvement, offered, and use and problems. Involvement increased steadily during adolescence with a slightly greater risk to transition from offers to use between 6th and 7th grades. Neighborhood disorder (AOR = 1.04, CI = 1.00, 1.08), drug activity (AOR = 1.12, CI = 1.02, 1.22) and disadvantage (AOR = 1.44, CI = 1.10, 1.92) were associated with the transition from marijuana offers to use and problems. Neighborhood disorder (AOR = 1.07, CI = 1.02, 1.11), drug activity (AOR = 1.19, CI = 1.10, 1.29) and violent crime (AOR = 1.17, CI = 1.03, 1.32) were associated with transitioning rapidly from no involvement to use and problems.

Conclusions

Understanding how neighborhoods could be organized and provided with supports to discourage marijuana use and promote non-drug using behaviors should be an important goal of any prevention program in low-income, urban Black neighborhoods. Enhancing citizen participation and mobilization to address the social processes of neighborhood disorder has the potential to reduce marijuana involvement in these neighborhoods.

Introduction

National data show that marijuana use now exceeds the rate of cigarette smoking among adolescents. In 2014, rates of past 30 day marijuana use were 6.5%, 16.6% and 21.2% among 8th, 10th and 12th graders compared to 4.0%, 7.2% and 13.6%, respectively for cigarettes (Johnston et al., 2015). Perceptions of harm are also shifting; only 36% of high school seniors think regular marijuana use places the user at great risk compared to 52% in 2009 and a high of 78% in the early 1990s (Johnston et al., 2015). Adolescent marijuana use is concerning not only because of the increased acute risk for motor vehicle crashes, engagement in risky sexual behaviors, and deficits in attention and memory but because of the long-term psychosocial effects associated with early use (Volkow et al., 2014). Although 9% of those that use marijuana will develop a cannabis use disorder, this risk increases to 1 in 6 for those who initiate in adolescence (Hall and Degenhardt, 2009). In addition, several researchers have demonstrated an association between adolescent marijuana use and poor school performance, unemployment, arrest and incarceration, and diminished lifetime satisfaction and achievement (Brook et al., 2013, Fergusson and Boden, 2008, Lynskey and Hall, 2000, Bray et al., 2000).

The negative impact of adolescent marijuana use is particularly concerning for low-income, urban Black youth; many of whom face other vulnerabilities that may hinder their ability to successfully transition to adulthood. Historically, rates of marijuana use have been higher in Whites than Blacks. However, this difference began to narrow in the 1990s and Black 8th, 10th and 12th graders now have higher rates of past 30 day marijuana use than Whites (Johnston et al., 2014). Despite these trends, limited research exists on the epidemiology of marijuana use among low-income, urban Black adolescents and even less on neighborhood factors that may be particularly salient for this community (Copeland-Linder et al., 2011).

Black youth disproportionately reside in neighborhoods with high levels of neighborhood disorder; neighborhoods characterized by crime, drug use, and violence. Research shows that illicit drugs are more prevalent in Black neighborhoods (LaVeist and Wallace, 2000), Black youth are more likely to witness drug sales and drug activity in their neighborhoods, and Black youth are more likely to be offered drugs (Wallace and Muroff, 2002). Black youth also rate their communities as more threatening than youth of other racial groups (Aneshensel and Sucoff, 1996). Disordered neighborhoods in which Black youth reside are often characterized by weakened social cohesion and controls that invite a wide-array of illegal behavior, like drug selling and use, and incivilities (Sampson et al., 1997). Black youth also disproportionately reside in neighborhoods with high levels of poverty (USDHHS, 2001). Concentrated disadvantage can isolate residents from key resources supporting collective social control leading to perceived powerlessness to intervene on behalf of the community (Williams and Collins, 1995, Brooks-Gunn et al., 1993). Neighborhoods with high concentrations of poverty are also often characterized by high levels of neighborhood disorder (Gephart, 1997). Hence, neighborhood disorder and the concentrated disadvantage that often accompanies it may increase the risk for the initiation and continued use of marijuana, because it is widely available and because it may weaken beliefs about the potential harm of drug use and strengthen positive expectancies of use. Living in disordered neighborhoods with high rates of crime and violence can also bring with it a constant feeling of threat and danger (Ross and Jang, 2000). This chronic stress can result in feelings of hopelessness and helplessness that can lead to adverse psychological outcomes such as depressed mood. According to the stress reduction hypothesis, marijuana use may be a means of coping with or alleviating the depressed mood that accompanies the stress of living in a violent neighborhood (Conger, 2005).

Limited research has found that perceptions of neighborhood disorder are associated with 10th grade drug use (defined as alcohol, tobacco or marijuana use) among low-income, urban Blacks (Lambert et al., 2004). In one of the few studies specific to marijuana use, young adult Black men in Chicago reporting high levels of neighborhood disorder and violence were more likely to report a history of marijuana use (Seth et al., 2012). In a sample of primarily Black youth in Baltimore, neighborhood physical, but not social disorder, was associated with marijuana use after high school (Furr-Holden et al., 2011, Furr-Holden et al., 2014). Using data from the same study but restricted to Blacks, Reboussin et al. (2014) found that perceptions of neighborhood disorder, increased drug activity and exposure to violence in 8th grade were associated with initiation and progression to more frequent marijuana use between 9th and 12th grades.

A comprehensive understanding of how neighborhood impacts marijuana use among low-income, urban Blacks is critical to the development of effective prevention programs and policy initiatives. This study addresses multiple gaps in the literature by expanding the measures of neighborhood beyond those that are typically considered, and examining their association with early adolescent marijuana use, which has not been studied in any depth and has been shown to be particularly detrimental in the long-term. Specifically, this investigation will (1) identify stages of marijuana involvement during 6th through 9th grades in a longitudinal, community sample of primarily low-income Blacks living in Baltimore, Maryland, (2) estimate the probability of progressing between these stages, and (3) examine the influence of neighborhood disorder, drug activity, violent crime, safety and disadvantage on these progressions.

Section snippets

Participants

Data are from a community-based longitudinal study conducted at the Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Prevention Research Center (BPRC; Ialongo et al., 1999). In 1993, 798 children and families representative of students entering 1st grade in nine Baltimore City schools were recruited to participate. Three 1st grade classrooms in each of 9 elementary schools were randomly assigned to one of two intervention conditions or to a control condition. Teachers and students were then randomly assigned

Results

Marijuana involvement and neighborhood characteristics from 6th through 9th grades are presented in Table 1. For all five measures, involvement increased from 6th through 9th grade. By ninth grade, 61.0% were offered marijuana, 34.7% had used marijuana, 16.8% had used it at least three times, and 30.5% experienced social and 12.9% health problems related to marijuana use. Although we incorporate time-varying covariates into the models, there is relative stability in the neighborhood

Discussion

We found evidence that marijuana involvement increases steadily during adolescence with a slightly higher probability of transitioning from offers to use between 6th and 7th grades compared to later years. Our findings highlight several significant predictors of transitions in marijuana involvement during adolescence. Neighborhood disorder and neighborhood drug activity were both associated with an increased risk of transitioning to marijuana use and problems; either directly from no

Role of funding source

This work was supported by R01-DA032550 and K01-DA031738 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

Contributors

Drs. Reboussin, Green and Ialongo conceptualized and drafted the manuscript. Dr. Reboussin conducted the statistical analysis. Drs. Furr-Holden, Milam and Johnson conducted the literature review. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

References (43)

  • J.W. Bray et al.

    The relationship between marijuana initiation and dropping out of high school

    Health Econ.

    (2000)
  • J.S. Brook et al.

    Adult work commitment, financial stability, and social environment as related to trajectories of marijuana use beginning in adolescence

    Subst. Abuse

    (2013)
  • J. Brooks-Gunn et al.

    Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development?

    Am. J. Sociol.

    (1993)
  • C. Chen et al.

    The adolescent behavioral repertoire as a context for drug exposure: behavioral autarcesis at play

    Addiction

    (2004)
  • J. Conger

    Reinforcement theory and the dynamics of alcoholism

    Q. J. Stud. Alcohol

    (2005)
  • N. Copeland-Linder et al.

    Contextual stress and health risk behaviors among African American adolescents

    J. Youth Adolesc.

    (2011)
  • T.J. Dishion et al.

    Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: a conceptual and empirical formulation

    Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev.

    (1998)
  • D.S. Elliott et al.

    Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use

    (1985)
  • D.M. Fergusson et al.

    Cannabis use and later life outcomes

    Addiction

    (2008)
  • C.D. Furr-Holden et al.

    Neighborhood environment and marijuana use in young adults

    Prev. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C.D.M. Furr-Holden et al.

    The growth of neighborhood disorder and marijuana use among urban adolescents: a case for policy and environmental interventions

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2011)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Neighborhood disadvantage moderates the effect of a mobile health intervention on adolescent depression

      2022, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      Results using the continuous home disadvantage variable (three-way moderator β = −0.61, 95% CI -1.27, 0.05, p = 0.073) and continuous activity space disadvantage variable (three-way moderator β = −0.91, 95% CI -1.81, −0.01, p = 0.0498) are broadly consistent with our main model results. We also acknowledge that while the neighborhood disadvantage index we use has been shown to be strongly associated with adolescent substance use and other health outcomes (Mennis et al., 2016; Reboussin et al., 2015; Ross and Mirowsky, 2001), it is derived from census survey data. While the use of US Census Bureau data facilitates the calculation of the measure, other measures, such as those that incorporate exposure to violence, crime or other indicators of neighborhood disorder, or that measure individuals’ perceptions of neighborhood disadvantage or disorder, may provide more robust measures of community-level socioeconomic context.

    • Local variation in cannabis use patterns among young adults in the San Francisco Bay Area

      2021, Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neighborhood disorder may be considered a tangible indicator of local (dis)investment as it has consistently been found to be reported more often in neighborhoods facing material disadvantage, at both individual and area levels. Further, it is consistently linked to substance use and poor health outcomes (Holmes et al., 2020; Ross and Mirowsky, 2001; Reboussin et al., 2015; Boardman et al., 2001). Social cohesion has also been shown to be lower in neighborhoods where perceived safety is also less, and reports of disorder are greater (Ross and Jang, 2000; Choi and Matz-Costa, 2017; Henderson et al., 2016).

    • A review investigating the relationship between cannabis use and adolescent cognitive functioning

      2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Academic difficulties were found to co-occur with externalizing and attention/concentration problems [21]. Youth who experienced academic problems in conjunction with attention/concentration problems were more likely to use cannabis [21]. Targeted interventions may further be necessary as literature highlights racial and ethnic differences in cannabis use [22].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Permanent address: Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48207, United States.

    View full text