Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 157, 1 December 2015, Pages 54-59
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Genetic and environmental contributions to initiation of cigarette smoking in young African-American and European-American women

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Initiation of smoking in women is influenced to a substantial degree by genetics.

  • Familial influences are stronger in European-American than African-American women.

  • Shared environmental factors contribute to initiation in European-American women.

  • Environmental influences are largely individual-specific in African-American women.

Abstract

Background

Distinctions in the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to initiation of cigarette smoking may explain, in part, the differences between African Americans and European Americans in the prevalence of smoking. The current investigation is the first to compare heritable and environmental influences on smoking initiation between African-American and European-American women.

Methods

Data were drawn from Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study participants and female Missouri Family Study participants (n = 4498; 21% African-American, the remainder European-American). Mean ages at first and last assessments were 17.0 (SD = 3.5) and 24.0 (SD = 3.2), respectively. Twin-sibling modeling was conducted to estimate the proportion of variance in smoking initiation (i.e., ever trying a cigarette) attributable to additive genetic, shared environmental, special twin environmental, and unique environmental factors.

Results

Additive genetic influences accounted for approximately half of the variance in smoking initiation in both African-American and European-American women. In the African-American subsample, the remaining variance was attributable primarily to unique environmental factors (46%; 95% CI: 28–71%). In the European-American subsample, only 12% (95% CI: 8–16%) of the variance was attributable to unique environmental factors, with the remainder accounted for by shared environmental (13%; 95% CI: 0–41%) and special twin environmental (24%; 95% CI: 0–52%) factors.

Conclusions

The estimated heritability of smoking initiation is substantial and nearly identical for African-American and European-American women, but the type of environmental factors that contribute to risk differ by race/ethnicity. Whereas the primary environmental influences on European-American women's smoking initiation are at the family level, those that impact African-American women's smoking initiation are primarily individual-specific.

Introduction

More than one-third of 12th graders (17–18-year olds) in the U.S. report smoking at least one cigarette during the last year (Johnston et al., 2014) and approximately one in three adolescents who try cigarettes will progress from experimentation to regular smoking (Choi et al., 1997, Flint et al., 1998). The rate of cigarette use among adolescents is currently as high for girls as boys (Johnston et al., 2014) and according to the 2014 Report of the Surgeon General (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014), smoking related disease risks for women now equal those for men, highlighting the importance of identifying mechanisms underlying early smoking behaviors in adolescent girls and young women.

Genetic factors play a major role in the development and persistence of smoking behaviors. The heritability of regular smoking (generally defined as smoking 100 or more cigarettes over the lifetime) has been estimated from twin studies to be between 50% and 80% (Agrawal et al., 2005, Kendler et al., 1999, True et al., 1997, Vink et al., 2005), although studies that have found sex differences have reported somewhat lower estimates for women: 32–46% (Broms et al., 2006, Hamilton et al., 2006, Madden et al., 2004). Genetic contributions to the earliest stage of smoking, experimentation with cigarettes or initiation of smoking (i.e., ever smoking a cigarette), have not been as extensively investigated, but heritability estimates of smoking initiation are in the same range as those for regular smoking (Hardie et al., 2006, Maes et al., 2004, Maes et al., 2006, Seglem et al., 2015). The estimated contribution of shared environment – environmental influences that make members of a twin pair alike, such as common peers and parenting – to initiation of smoking is less consistent across studies but appears to vary systematically by age. For example, in Seglem et al.’s study of 12–18 year-old twins (2015) and Boomsma et al.’s study of 13–22 year-old twins (1994), shared environment accounted for 56% and 59%, respectively, of variance in smoking initiation, whereas neither Maes et al. (2004) nor Hardie et al. (2006) found any evidence for shared environmental influences in their studies based on middle aged twins.

The twin studies to date have been instrumental in developing etiological models of smoking initiation in individuals of European ancestry but have only rarely examined smoking behaviors in African Americans. Differences in smoking behaviors between African Americans and European Americans are well documented. There is consistent evidence that the lifetime prevalence of smoking (Hu et al., 2006, Lawrence et al., 2007) and risk for progression to regular smoking (Griesler et al., 2002, Kandel et al., 2004, Vega et al., 2007) are lower in African Americans than European Americans. African Americans also initiate smoking at an older age (Andreski and Breslau, 1993, Duncan et al., 2012, Mickens et al., 2010) and continue to smoke later into adulthood (Moon-Howard, 2003).

We are aware of only one large-scale twin study to examine smoking behaviors in African Americans, an earlier investigation by our group (Sartor et al., 2009) that was based exclusively on African-American (AA) young women. Consistent with prior studies based on adults of European ancestry, 62% of variance in initiation of smoking (ever smoking a cigarette) was attributable to genetics and the remainder to unique – also known as individual-specific – environmental influences (i.e., environmental influences not shared by family members); shared environment was not implicated. Although an important step toward improving our understanding of liability to smoking initiation among African Americans, in the absence of European-American (EA) participants, a direct comparison between racial/ethnic groups in the relative influence of genetic vs. environmental factors could not be made. The current study, which integrated data from female participants in a high-risk family study (52% AA) with data from female twin study participants (14% AA), was designed to test for differences between AA and EA young women in the relative contribution of genetic, shared environmental, and individual-specific environmental influences on initiation of cigarette smoking.

Section snippets

Methods

Data were drawn from the Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study (MOAFTS) and the Missouri Family Study (MOFAM). Both studies were approved by Washington University's Human Research Protections Office. MOFAM was also approved by the Ethics Board of the State Department of Health and Senior Services (which was not required at the time that MOAFTS started).

Sibling pair correlations

Sibling pair correlations, calculated separately for AA and EA participants, are shown in Table 1. For MZ and DZ twin pairs (but not non-twin sibling pairs), correlations were lower in AA than EA participants, suggestive of an overall lesser degree of familial influence on initiation among AA than EA young women.

However, the correlations suggested the presence of genetic factors in both AA and EA subsamples. For African Americans, the DZ and non-twin sibling correlations were about half the

Discussion

The current investigation applied a twin-sibling modeling approach to identifying possible sources of distinctions in liability of AA vs. EA adolescent girls and young women to initiation of cigarette smoking. By expanding on our previous study based exclusively on AA twins (Sartor et al., 2009) through the incorporation of EA participants and integration of non-twin sibling pairs, we were able to detect racial/ethnic differences in the total contribution of familial influences to smoking

Role of funding sources

Funding for this study was provided by grants AA090022, AA011998, AA012640, AA017688, AA017915, AA017921, AA021492, and AA023549 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, grant DA23668 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, grant HD049024 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and a grant from the Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust.

The National Institutes of Health and the Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust had no

Contributors

Dr. Sartor conducted the literature searches and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, Dr. Grant conducted the statistical analyses, and Dr. Agrawal provided consultation on analyses. Drs. Bucholz, Heath, and Madden designed the studies from which data were drawn and oversaw data collection. All authors provided input on the study design and edited the manuscript. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References (49)

  • W.A. Vega et al.

    Smoking, drugs, and other behavioral health problems among multiethnic adolescents in the NHSDA

    Addict. Behav.

    (2007)
  • A. Agrawal et al.

    Correlates of regular cigarette smoking in a population-based sample of Australian twins

    Addiction

    (2005)
  • K.H. Beck et al.

    A survey of parent attitudes and practices regarding underage drinking

    J. Youth Adolesc.

    (1995)
  • D.I. Boomsma et al.

    Genetic and social influences on starting to smoke: a study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents

    Addiction

    (1994)
  • U. Broms et al.

    Genetic architecture of smoking behavior: a study of Finnish adult twins

    Twin Res. Hum. Genet.

    (2006)
  • K.K. Bucholz et al.

    A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report of the reliability of the SSAGA

    J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1994)
  • W.J. Calvert et al.

    Early drinking and its association with adolescents’ participation in risky behaviors

    J. Am. Psychiatr. Nurses Assoc.

    (2010)
  • M.A. Corneille et al.

    Ethnic identity, neighborhood risk, and adolescent drug and sex attitudes and refusal efficacy: the urban African American girls’ experience

    J. Drug Educ.

    (2007)
  • P.C. Griesler et al.

    Ethnic differences in predictors of initiation and persistence of adolescent cigarette smoking in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth

    Nicot. Tob. Res.

    (2002)
  • A.S. Hamilton et al.

    Gender differences in determinants of smoking initiation and persistence in California twins

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.

    (2006)
  • A.C. Heath et al.

    Resiliency factors protecting against teenage alcohol use and smoking: influences of religion, religious involvement and values, and ethnicity in the Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study

    Twin Res.

    (1999)
  • M. Hesselbrock et al.

    A validity study of the SSAGA – a comparison with the SCAN

    Addiction

    (1999)
  • M.C. Hu et al.

    Epidemiology and correlates of daily smoking and nicotine dependence among young adults in the United States

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2006)
  • L.D. Johnston et al.

    Monitoring the Future National Survey Results On Drug Use: 1975–2013: Overview, Key Findings On Adolescent Drug Use

    (2014)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Racial differences in heritability of cigarette smoking in adolescents and young adults

      2016, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      The present findings for the White group across all three age groups are consistent with previous analyses indicating that additive genetic factors play a role in cigarette use initiation that get stronger with age (Do et al., 2015; Maes et al., 2004). To date, only one other study exists that has examined racial differences in heritability of cigarette use initiation (Sartor et al., 2015) but that sample included only female-female pairs. Sartor and colleagues did not detect racial differences in heritability of cigarette use initiation perhaps because their analyses were not sensitive to developmental or sex differences.

    • The genetic relationship between cannabis and tobacco cigarette use in European- and African-American female twins and siblings

      2016, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      For cigarette use, we are only aware of 3 studies, including two by us in the sample under study here, that show that additive genetic factors explain similar proportions of variance (40–50%) in AAs and EAs (Sartor et al., 2009, 2015; Whitfield et al., 2007). However, in a recent study by our group (Sartor et al., 2015), the remainder of the variance in cigarette use was solely attributable to individual-specific environmental factors (44%) in AA twins while in EA twins, substantial influence of both individual-specific (10%) and shared environmental factors (34%) was noted for cigarette use. Likewise, we have previously reported that timing to cannabis use is heritable in AA female twins (0.52) and that the role of shared environment is limited (Sartor et al., 2009).

    • Saliva DNA Methylation Detects Nascent Smoking in Adolescents

      2019, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
    View full text