Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 159, 1 February 2016, Pages 272-276
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Short communication
The effects of alcohol-containing e-cigarettes on young adult smokers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The consequences of using e-cigarettes that contain alcohol are unknown.

  • In young adult smokers, the effects of matched commercial e-liquids containing either 23.5% or 0.4% alcohol were compared.

  • Differences in acute subjective drug effects were not observed.

  • Psychomotor performance improved under the trace, but not under the high alcohol condition.

  • In some subjects, a urine alcohol metabolite became detectable after use of the high alcohol e-cigarette.

Abstract

Background

The liquids (e-liquids) used in an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) contain myriad chemicals without adequate human inhalation safety data. Furthermore, the absence of e-liquid labeling requirements poses a formidable challenge to understanding how e-liquid constituents may promote nicotine addiction and/or have independent or synergistic biological effects when combined with nicotine. Ethyl alcohol is such a constituent, but has received little scientific interest in this context.

Methods

Using a randomized, double blind, crossover design, acute changes in subjective drug effects, motor performance and biochemical measures of alcohol and nicotine intake were evaluated after directed and ad lib puffing from two commercially available e-liquids containing nicotine (8 mg/ml), vanilla flavor and either 23.5% (high) or 0.4% (trace) alcohol.

Results

While no differences in subjective drug effects were observed between alcohol conditions, performance on the Purdue Pegboard Dexterity Test (PPDT) improved under the trace, but not under the 23.5% alcohol condition. Although plasma alcohol levels remained undetectable during testing, urine ethyl glucuronide (EtG), an alcohol metabolite, became measurable in three participants after puffing from the 23.5% alcohol e-cigarette.

Conclusions

Brief use of a widely available type of e-cigarette containing an e-liquid purchased from an internet vendor can negatively impact psychomotor performance and in some instances, produce detectable levels of a urine alcohol metabolite. Given the widespread and unregulated use of e-cigarettes, especially by youth and other vulnerable populations, further studies are needed to evaluate both the acute safety and long-term health risks of using alcohol-containing e-cigarettes.

Introduction

Identifying the human health consequences from inhaling the complex, poorly characterized, and evolving chemical mixtures associated with unregulated e-cigarette use is a daunting public health problem (Dutra and Glantz, 2014, Bhatnagar et al., 2014, Grana et al., 2014). While most e-liquids contain a ‘base mixture’ of glycerol and propylene glycol to which nicotine and various flavoring ingredients are added, ethanol (ethyl alcohol) is also a variable but frequent ingredient due to its ubiquity and utility as a solvent for e-liquid additives (Cai and Kendall, 2009, Ellicott, 2009, Herrington and Myers, 2015, Tygat, 2007, Valance and Ellicott, 2008). For example, in a recent chemical analysis or 42 commercial e-liquids, 30 contained ethyl alcohol (Varlet et al., 2015) and in a separate analysis of four leading brand first generation e-cigarettes, ethyl alcohol was found in all four although it was absent from their ingredient lists (Herrington et al., 2015). Importantly, alcohol was also found in the aerosols produced from these four e-cigarettes and an earlier analysis identified alcohol in an e-cigarette ‘mist’ (Laugesen, 2008).

Compared to the exhaustively studied effects of ingested alcohol, there are only a few studies on the behavioral effects of inhaled alcohol in humans, and these have focused on simulating low-level occupational exposures (Nadeau et al., 2003, Dumas-Campagna et al., 2014). To our knowledge, no previous studies have systematically examined the acute effects of alcohol inhaled from an e-cigarette. Likewise, the prevalence and patterns of alcohol exposure from e-cigarette use are largely unknown. While Internet-based anecdotal evidence indicates that some e-cigarette users ‘spike’ their e-liquids with various types of alcohol, the motivation for such use remains speculative (https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/threads/effects-of-adding-liquor-to-e-liquid.57173). In other instances, alcohol may be deliberately added to e-liquids to ‘thin’ viscous solutions as recommended by do-it-yourself (DIY) e-liquid forums (https://vaporizingtimes.com/alcohol-e-cig/) and ‘alcohol e-cigarettes’ may soon be entering the marketplace (U.S.P.T.O., 2015; http://www.clearette.com/blog/alcoholic-e-cigarettes/). Consequently, whether from commercially prepared products or from self-made e-liquids, many e-cigarette users are likely repeatedly inhaling variable levels of alcohol during routine e-cigarette use.

The possibility of widespread exposure to inhaled alcohol as a consequence of e-cigarette use has many significant public health implications, especially for youth and other vulnerable populations. While the amount of alcohol delivered by an e-cigarette may be insufficient to induce typical intoxication, any alcohol that is inhaled is likely to rapidly enter the brain and modulate its functions. For example, if inhaled alcohol has reinforcing properties, then its combination with nicotine may enhance nicotine reinforcement and promote progression to nicotine dependence in non-dependent users (Oliver et al., 2013). Because nicotine is a relatively weak primary reinforcer when compared to other drugs of abuse (e.g., cocaine, alcohol or opiates), the inhalation of combined nicotine and alcohol during e-cigarette use may promote the development and maintenance of nicotine addiction through exposure to this additional reinforcer (Sorge et al., 2009). Likewise, the co-administration of alcohol and nicotine may promote the progression to dependence for both substances given their synergistic effects on reinforcement (McKee et al., 2006, Tizabi et al., 2007). Finally, because inhalation is a reliable and rapid method for inducing alcohol dependence in rodents, chronic inhalation from alcohol-containing e-cigarettes may promote the development of alcohol dependence in humans (Gilpin et al., 2008), while episodic use may provide ‘priming’ doses that induce craving for alcohol (Duka et al., 1999, O’Malley et al., 2002).

To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the acute subjective or motor effects of puffing from commercial e-liquids with a specified alcohol content. As a first step in addressing this knowledge gap, we assayed the alcohol concentration in a convenience sample of 31 e-liquids. The effects of the e-liquid with the highest concentration (23.5% alcohol) were then compared to an e-liquid with a trace amount of alcohol (0.4%) in a randomized, double blind, crossover study. Subjective drug effects, psychomotor performance, and changes from baseline in blood alcohol and urine ethyl glucuronide (EtG) levels were compared between the ‘nicotine + high alcohol’ and ‘nicotine + trace alcohol’ e-cigarette conditions.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty (14 male and 6 female) cigarette smokers between 21 and 35 years old, who reported drinking socially, use of an e-cigarette at least once in the past year, and daily or non-daily use of tobacco cigarettes within the past 6 months, were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included unstable medical or psychiatric conditions, use of psychotropic medications and pregnancy. Four participants were excluded from the analysis because they did not complete any test session (two for for exclusionary drug

Results

Subjective drug effects, as assessed by the DEQ and BAES, did not show any condition differences (condition or condition by time effects p-values >0.05, Fig. 1). As expected, group mean PPDT performance scores in descending order were for the dominant hand, the non-dominant hand and then both hands (main effect for hand: F (2,251) = 58.59, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, composite performance scores (the sum of scores for the right, left and both hands) improved under the trace (F (2,251) = 9.10, p = 

Discussion

In young adult smokers, puffing from a commercial e-liquid containing 23.5% alcohol, as compared to use of a matched trace alcohol e-liquid, did not alter ratings of subjective drug effects. As expected, performance on the PPDT improved with repeated testing under trace alcohol, but no such improvement was observed under the 23.5% alcohol condition. Although the differences in the PPDT composite change scores between the two conditions, 2.9 after directed puffing and 3.4 after ad lib puffing,

Conflicts of interest

No conflict declared.

Contributors

All authors have contributed to and have approved the final manuscript. Gerald Valentine and Mehmet Sofuoglu designed the study and wrote the manuscript. Peter Jatlow and Haleh Nadim conducted biochemical assays. Marcedes Coffman assisted with study design/protocol development and participated in the daily conduct of study and data collection. Ralitza Gueorguieva performed all statistical analyses.

Role of funding source

Research reported in this publication was supported by the New England Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Statistical analyses, biochemical assays, and analyses of e-cigarette solutions were supported by the Administrative and Laboratory cores of P50DA036151 (Yale TCORS) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products. The

References (37)

  • A. Costantino et al.

    The effect of the use of mouthwash on ethylglucuronide concentrations in urine

    J. Anal. Toxicol.

    (2006)
  • S. Domhof et al.

    Nonparametric Analysis Of Longitudinal Data In Factorial Experiments

    (2002)
  • J. Dumas-Campagna et al.

    Ethanol toxicokinetics resulting from inhalation exposure in human volunteers and toxicokinetic modeling

    Inhal. Toxicol.

    (2014)
  • L.M. Dutra et al.

    Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents: a cross-sectional study

    JAMA Pediatr.

    (2014)
  • Ellicott, M., 2009. Analysis Of Components From E-Juice XX High 36mg/Ml Rated Nicotine Solution Ref S 55434. Report...
  • Gilpin, N.W., Richardson, H.N., Cole, M., Koob, G.F., 2008. Vapor inhalation of alcohol in rats. Curr. Protoc....
  • R. Grana et al.

    E-cigarettes: a scientific review

    Circulation

    (2014)
  • Herrington, J.S., Myers, C., Rigdon, A. 2015. Analysis of Nicotine and Impurities in Electronic Cigarette Solutions and...
  • Cited by (25)

    • Inhaling alcohol vapour or mist: An international study of use, effects and harms

      2020, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Homemade alternatives include using a bicycle pump with a corked plastic bottle containing alcohol – the pressure is increased within the bottle and then released, causing the alcohol to vaporise; and pouring ethanol over dry ice – the solid CO2 sublimes into a gas on contact with ethanol and causes the ethanol vapour above to condense into a liquid aerosol which can subsequently be inhaled. Online communities for e-cigarette users contain advice for ‘do-it-yourself’ recipes for vaping alcohol (Valentine et al., 2016). To our knowledge there have been no publications addressing the use, subjective effects, and acute risks of inhaling alcohol mist.

    • Association between preference for using alcohol beverage-named e-liquids and alcohol use among high school youth

      2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, we focused on alcohol beverage-named e-liquids and did not actually examine alcohol levels in these e-liquids. While some e-liquids have been shown to contain ethyl alcohol as a constituent (Poklis et al., 2017) and impact psychomotor performance (Valentine et al., 2016), we do not know if the alcohol beverage-named e-liquid flavors actually contain alcohol. Future studies need to examine if youth are drawn to these e-liquids because of their alcohol-based names, flavors, or because of the actual alcohol content.

    • Ethyl glucuronide hair testing: A review

      2019, Forensic Science International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Occupational exposure to alcohol-containing products (e.g. hand sanitizers) may falsely increase urine [EtG], but doesn’t appear to affect hEtG concentration [107]. Intentional inhalation of EtOH vapor (e.g. e-cigarettes) is much less common than oral ingestion, and few studies are available on the matter; urinary EtG (and EtS) appears to be the most reliable marker to detect this type of alcohol exposure [108,109], whereas possible positivity and levels of hEtG following ethanol vapor inhalation have not been investigated so far. In 2012, Martins Ferreira et al. [110], expanding on previous findings by Gareri et al. [111], evaluated and rejected the possibility of obtaining false positive hEtG results after prolonged use of ethanol-containing hair products; however.

    • Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review

      2017, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some liquids and vapor contain some potentially toxic constituents, but in far fewer numbers and at much lower or trace levels than found in smoke. There have been 116 articles that examine the impact of vaping on human health142,150,162,169,193,195,197–305 and 13 on animal health.243,306–317 Studies address physiologic and cognitive effects of vaping, adverse events associated with vaping, exposure to secondhand vapor, and cytotoxicity of ENDS.

    • Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

      2022, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text