Review
A systematic review of the motivations for the non-medical use of prescription drugs in young adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Young adults are most at-risk for the non-medical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD).

  • A systematic review of motivations for NMUPD in individuals ages 18–25 was conducted.

  • Results revealed that much of the work is limited in scope (e.g., college students).

  • Using drugs for their generally known effects and recreational motives were popular.

  • Inconsistent terminology and temporal issues are current concerns in this literature.

Abstract

Background

Young adults (18–25) are most at-risk for the non-medical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD). Understanding this population's motivations for use can help inform efforts to reduce NMUPD. Therefore, this systematic review synthesizes the findings from research on young adults' motivations to engage in NMUPD.

Methods

Based on PRISMA guidelines, relevant databases were systematically searched for articles that assessed the motivations for NMUPD in young adults and college-aged students. Search strings included a range of prescription drug classes and terms to ensure an exhaustive review.

Results

The search resulted in identifying 353 potential articles after duplicates were removed, and 37 articles were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Of the final articles, the majority investigated the non-medical use of prescription stimulants in U.S. student populations cross-sectionally. Seven studies, either exclusively or in combination with other medications, researched prescription opioids, and five investigated central nervous system depressants. Only one study investigated motivations over time.

Conclusion

There are many ways in which the current literature can be expanded, including researching other populations and focusing on prescriptions other than stimulants. Using the medications for their prescribed properties and known side effects emerged as a consistent theme. It was also fairly common for young adults to report recreational motives. Issues with measurement and definitions of key terms (e.g., non-medical) would benefit from consistency in future work. Research on motivations should continue and be incorporated into the larger drug use context, as well as existing prevention and intervention strategies.

Introduction

The non-medical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD) is a significant and growing public health concern with young adults at great risk for use, abuse, and related negative outcomes (e.g., National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA, 2011). According to NIDA, NMUPD occurs when individuals either use medications that were not prescribed to them, use their prescribed medications in higher quantities or manners other than prescribed, or take medications for purposes other than prescribed (e.g., to get high; NIDA, 2014). The types of prescription drugs used for non-medical purposes most often are stimulants, opioids, and central nervous system (CNS) depressants (NIDA, 2011).

As a population characterized by instability and experimentation, young adults (ages 18–25) are clearly an at-risk group for substance use (Arnett, 2005). It is during young adulthood that, on average, people report initiation of illicit substance use, including NMUPD (SAMHSA, 2013b). Young adults exhibit the greatest illicit drug use compared to all other age groups in the United States (SAMHSA, 2013b). Additionally, within the twenties is the mean age for onset of NMUPD disorders, and for seeking treatment for these disorders (Huang et al., 2006). Further, there is evidence suggesting that adolescent decision-making is different than that of young adults, which is different from older adults, as a result of brain development (for a reviews see Spear, 2013, Steinberg, 2008). Consequently the motivations to engage in NMUPD, and the interventions targeting NMUPD, will likely vary by age. Therefore, this review focuses on the developmental period of young adulthood, the population considered most at-risk.

NMUPD is the second most commonly reported form of illicit substance use by young adults, after marijuana (SAMHSA, 2013b). This is a growing public health concern. For example in 2014, 884,000 young adults engaged in NMUPD for the first time in the past year (Lipari et al., 2015). In full-time college students (ages 18–22), NMUPD initiation peaked with an average of 850 new users per day for prescription opioids alone in 2013 (Lipari, 2015). More people have also been seeking treatment for prescription opioid abuse, with rates for young adults increasing by approximately 26% from 2002 to 2010 (SAMHSA, 2011).

NMUPD has been linked with abuse and dependence (Huang et al., 2006, Hurwitz, 2005, Kroutil et al., 2006; SAMHSA, 2013b), and a variety of other negative outcomes in young adults, including mental illness (Arria et al., 2008, Bavarian et al., 2013, Janusis and Weyandt, 2010, Lo et al., 2013, McCauley et al., 2009, McCauley et al., 2010, McCauley et al., 2011, Van Eck et al., 2012, Zullig and Divin, 2012), increasing number of emergency room visits (SAMHSA, 2013a,b), a risk factor for arrest and delinquency (Drazdowski et al., 2015, Herman-Stahl et al., 2007), and more unintentional overdose deaths (Paulozzi, 2012). Additionally, young adults who engage in NMUPD are significantly more likely than their peers to use other illicit drugs and to combine prescription drugs with alcohol and other substances, which increases the risk of potentially dangerous drug interactions and their negative outcomes (Garnier et al., 2009, McCabe et al., 2006; SAMHSA, 2006). Of particular concern for young adults in collegiate settings, many students who endorsed the non-medical use of prescription stimulants and opioids also reported spending less time studying, skipping classes more often, earning lower grades (Arria et al., 2008), and more frequent sexual risk behaviors (Benotsch et al., 2011). Clearly NMUPD, particularly by young adults, is a large and growing public health problem with significant consequences.

Unfortunately, the majority of individuals with NMUPD disorders never receive treatment for their drug use problems or any mental health issues (Huang et al., 2006). One way to prevent substance use is to investigate why specific groups of people use and to target interventions specifically to certain predictors. One of these factors, on the individual level, is the motivations for why young adults decide to engage in NMUPD. Although it is only one small piece of the etiology for drug use and abuse, and needs to be considered along with other factors such as molecular genetics, personality patterns, culture, etc. (see Kendler, 2012); motivations can be self-reported and are amendable to change (e.g., Miller et al., 1993). Previous research supports that motivations for substance use are important predictors of use patterns and problems in young adults. For example, drinking motivations have been found to predict alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in young adults and adolescents (Kuntsche et al., 2005), as well as mediate or moderate environmental and individual variables with alcohol-related outcomes in these populations (Cooper et al., 2000, Magid et al., 2007, Kuntsche et al., 2010, Kenney et al., 2014). Research investigating motivations in young adults supports that similar patterns exists for NMUPD. For example, varying NMUPD motivations have been linked with diverse use outcomes, including likelihood of binge drinking, using other illicit substances, and screening positive for drug and alcohol abuse (McCabe et al., 2009).

Since different motivations relate to different patterns of use and outcomes, prevention and intervention efforts will likely need to be targeted to most effectively address the individual's needs based on their specific motivations for use. For instance, an individual reporting addiction as a motive may need different treatment than an individual reporting recreational motives, like to have fun. Additionally, motivations have been recognized by SAMHSA as an important treatment target (SAMHSA, 2013c). Therefore, this review examines studies that have investigated young adults’ motivations to engage in NMUPD. Based on a systematic review, the research that has been conducted to date is presented by prescription drug class and followed by a critical analysis and discussion of directions for future research.

Section snippets

Search strategies

The literature search conducted for this review utilized the PRISMA guidelines (Liberati et al., 2009). Studies were selected from several sources including PubMed, PsychINFO, Academic Search Complete, and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. Systematic literature searches were conducted to identify potentially eligible articles from peer-reviewed journals, using search terms related to motivation, prescription drugs, non-medical use, abuse and misuse, and young adults. References

Results

Fig. 2 shows the PRISMA diagram for the search that led to the final number of studies included in this review. From the initial 353 articles that remained after duplicates had been removed (i.e., the same articles that were identified across searches in different databases), 248 articles were excluded by reviewing the articles’ titles and/or abstracts if they clearly did not meet the search criteria (e.g., included non-human samples). From this, 105 full-text articles were reviewed and 68 were

More research needed in the NMUPD field

This systematic review synthesized the research findings from studies investigating NMUPD in young adults, primarily ages 18–25, who are the most at-risk for NMUPD. The results highlight that an overwhelming majority of the work is limited in scope; such that most of the research has been conducted on motivations for the non-medical use of stimulant medications in student samples from the United States. Clearly, there are many areas for growth based on this observation alone. For example, of

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared.

Role of funding source

Nothing declared.

Contributors

Tess K. Drazdowski, MS contributed to the conception and design for the current paper, analyzing and interpreting data, drafting the manuscript, and critically revising the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Drs. Joshua Langberg, James McCullough, Wendy Kliewer, and Albert Farrell for their guidance, feedback, and suggestions on this manuscript. Additionally, thank you to the anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their thoughtful feedback on this manuscript.

References (81)

  • L.A. Kroutil et al.

    Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants in the United States

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2006)
  • E. Kuntsche et al.

    Why do young people drink?: a review of drinking motives

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (2005)
  • S. Lord et al.

    Nonmedical use of prescription opioids and stimulants among student pharmacists

    J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.

    (2009)
  • V. Magid et al.

    Differentiating between sensation seeking and impulsivity through their mediated relations with alcohol use and problems

    Addict. Behav.

    (2007)
  • S.E. McCabe et al.

    Subtypes of nonmedical prescription drug misuse

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2009)
  • S.E. McCabe et al.

    Motives, diversion and routes of administration associated with nonmedical use of prescription opioids

    Addict. Behav.

    (2007)
  • J.L. McCauley et al.

    Mental health and rape history in relation to non-medical use of prescription drugs in a national sample of women

    Addict. Behav.

    (2009)
  • J.L. McCauley et al.

    Non-medical use of prescription drugs in a national sample of college women

    Addict. Behav.

    (2011)
  • L.J. Paulozzi

    Prescription drug overdoses: a review

    J. Saf. Res.

    (2012)
  • L.P. Spear

    Adolescent neurodevelopment

    J. Adolesc. Health

    (2013)
  • L. Steinberg

    A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking

    Dev. Rev.

    (2008)
  • K.J. Zullig et al.

    The association between non-medical prescription drug use, depressive symptoms, and suicidality among college students

    Addict. Behav.

    (2012)
  • C.D. Advokat et al.

    Licit and illicit use of medications for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in undergraduate college students

    J. Am. Coll. Health

    (2008)
  • J.J. Arnett

    The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood

    J. Drug Issues

    (2005)
  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and analgesics: associations with social and academic behaviors among college students

    J. Drug Issues

    (2008)
  • S.P. Barrett et al.

    Characteristics of methylphenidate misuse in a university student sample

    Can. J. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • M.L. Cooper et al.

    A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: the role of personality and affect regulatory processes

    J. Pers.

    (2000)
  • A.D. DeSantis et al.

    Illicit use of prescription ADHD medications on a college campus: a multimethodological approach

    J. Am. Coll. Health

    (2008)
  • R.L. Dupont et al.

    Characteristics and motives of college students who engage in nonmedical use of methylphenidate

    Am. J. Addict.

    (2008)
  • C.L. Dussault et al.

    An examination of prescription stimulant misuse and psychological variables among sorority and fraternity college populations

    J. Atten. Disord.

    (2013)
  • A.G. Franke et al.

    Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany

    Pharmacopsychiatry

    (2011)
  • A.R. Gallucci et al.

    Pill popping problems: the non-medical use of stimulant medications in an undergraduate sample

    Drugs

    (2014)
  • L.M. Garnier et al.

    Nonmedical prescription analgesic use and concurrent alcohol consumption among college students

    Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse

    (2009)
  • L.M. Garnier-Dykstra et al.

    Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants during college: four-year trends in exposure opportunity, use, motives, and sources

    J. Am. Coll. Health

    (2012)
  • L.A. Ghandour et al.

    Alcohol and illegal drug use behaviors and prescription opioids use: how do nonmedical and medical users compare, and does motive to use really matter?

    Eur. Addict. Res.

    (2013)
  • K.M. Hall et al.

    Illicit use of prescribed stimulant medication among college students

    J. Am. Coll. Health

    (2005)
  • C.M. Hartung et al.

    Stimulant medication use in college students: comparison of appropriate users, misusers, and nonusers

    Psychol. Addict. Behav.

    (2013)
  • L. Herman et al.

    The use of prescription stimulants to enhance academic performance among college students in health care programs

    J. Physician Assist. Educ.

    (2011)
  • K. Holloway et al.

    Prescription drug misuse among university staff and students: a survey of motives, nature and extent

    Drugs

    (2012)
  • B. Huang et al.

    Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of nonmedical prescription drug use and drug use disorders in the United States: results of the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Motivations for the nonmedical use of prescription drugs in a longitudinal national sample of young adults

      2020, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      While participants most commonly reported infrequent use across prescription drug class (1–2 occasions in the past year), certain motivations were popular across the three waves of data for NMUPD, and the majority of young adults endorsed multiple motivations, with four to five popular reasons for using each prescription drug class, including the clinical reasons the medications were prescribed (e.g., opioid for pain relief), self-treatment motivations (e.g., to relax; to sleep), and recreational motivations (e.g., to feel good or get high). Our results support both the self-medication hypothesis (Duncan, 1974; Khantzian, 1985, 1997) and Arnett's (2005) theory on recreational substance use in emerging adulthood, and are similar to prior cross-sectional research of young adults (for a review, see Drazdowski, 2016) and to other population-based studies on NMUPD motives across adulthood (e.g., Compton et al., 2018; Han et al., 2017; Hughes et al., 2016). Our findings also support the use of personalized feedback as an intervention for NMUPD, similar to prior studies of alcohol interventions in college students (Blevins & Stephens, 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text