Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 168, 1 November 2016, Pages 128-134
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Full length article
Personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards the use of nonmedical prescription stimulants to improve academic performance among university students in seven European countries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.639Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Students’ nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) varied across Europe.

  • Personal approval of NMUPS was high among European university students.

  • Students perceived the peer NMUPS to be higher than their personal use.

  • Perceived peer use was associated with higher personal use of NMUPS.

Abstract

Background

Overestimations of non-prescribed stimulant use of peers are well documented in the USA and have also been identified as predictive of personal stimulant consumption. This study aimed to examine whether overestimations of peer use and approval of the use are associated with personal use and attitude towards the use of non-prescribed stimulants among European university students.

Method

The EU funded ‘Social Norms Intervention for the prevention of Polydrug usE (SNIPE)’ study was conducted in seven European countries. In a web-based questionnaire, 4482 students were asked about their personal use and their attitude towards non-prescribed stimulant use, as well as the perceived peer use and peer attitude.

Results

59% of students thought that the majority of their peers used non-prescribed stimulants more frequently than themselves, and only 4% thought that the use of the majority was lower than their personal use. The perception that the majority of peers had used non-prescribed stimulants at least once was significantly associated with higher odds for personal use of non-prescribed stimulants (OR: 3.30, 95% CI: 2.32–4.71). In addition, the perception that the majority of peers approved of the non-prescribed use of stimulants was associated with a 4.03 (95% CI: 3.35–4.84) times higher likelihood for personal approval.

Discussion

European university students generally perceived the non-prescribed use of stimulants of peers to be higher than their personal use. This perception, as well as a perception of higher approval in the peer group, was associated with a higher likelihood of personal non-prescribed stimulant medication use and approval.

Introduction

The nonmedical use of prescription medicines (NMUPM) is a debated topic in science, society and media (Arria and DuPont, 2010). For instance, interest in this topic was stirred in 2008 when one informal online poll revealed that 20% of a sample of 1400 scientists from 60 countries reported that they had used medicines not prescribed by a physician to stimulate their focus, concentration, or memory (Maher, 2008). Currently, there are several prescription medicines available that are known for their potential to enhance cognitive functioning. One well-known substance is the stimulant ‘methylphenidate’ which is used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment. Methylphenidate formulations like Ritalin® and Concerta® are approved in Europe for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents, as well as for persons continuing treatment into adulthood. Regarding the approval of ADHD treatment for persons diagnosed in adulthood, there are differences across European countries. In Germany, methylphenidate is approved for treatment of adult ADHD (BfArM, 2011) and in the U.K., adult ADHD is recognized as a condition (NICE, 2016) whereas other countries, such as Belgium and Denmark, only approved methylphenidate for treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents aged 6–17 years. Methylphenidate was also the substance most commonly used by those scientists who reported cognitive enhancement in the above-mentioned study (Maher, 2008).

Previous research has demonstrated that the prevalence of NMUPM can be particularly high among university and college student populations compared to their same-age counterparts in the general population (Herman-Stahl et al., 2007). Most lifetime nonmedical users of prescription stimulants started consuming during high school (Austic, 2015) or during their early college years (Teter et al., 2006). Within the range of prescription medicines, stimulants were more often used by students compared to other medications, such as pain relief or anti-anxiety medications (Brandt et al., 2014). Reasons for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) among university students are to improve concentration and to perform better in university (Teter et al., 2006). Considering the existing evidence base of NMUPS, in our study, NMUPS was defined as the nonmedical use of medication which was not prescribed and which was used with the intention to improve academic performance.

The nonmedical use of prescription stimulants to improve cognitive achievement has raised some public health concerns because of possible adverse side effects in healthy young adults (Lakhan and Kirchgessner, 2012). Furthermore, an approved medication intended for a different indication may give consumers a false impression of such medication’s safety combined with a low awareness of possible side effects if used non-prescribed (Compton and Volkow, 2006). Indeed, research has shown that NMUPS is associated with a higher likelihood to use other substances, including alcohol, tobacco and cocaine (Sepulveda et al., 2011). This is a major concern, because previous research suggested that students who used non-prescribed stimulants and alcohol simultaneously experienced considerably more negative consequences of use compared to students that did not use both substances at a time (Egan et al., 2013).

One highly influential factor in predicting substance use behavior in young people is the perception of the behavior among peers. Research in this field showed that inaccurate perceptions regarding others’ substance use behavior exist (Perkins, 1997, Perkins, 2007). Young adults may falsely assume that the peer group behaves differently from the actual existing norm (misperception) or from their individual self-reported behavior (self-other discrepancies; Borsari and Carey, 2003). Perceptions of substance use in the peer group can be related to the quantity and frequency of peer substance use (descriptive norm) or to perceptions of peer approval of substance use (injunctive norm). Most evidence on incorrect perceptions regarding substance use in student populations is related to descriptive norms regarding alcohol use (Berkowitz, 2004, Page et al., 2008, Perkins et al., 2005, Perkins et al., 1999). It is known that perceived descriptive norms of peer alcohol use have an impact on individual drinking behavior. Studies showed that the perception of alcohol use among peers is associated with a higher likelihood of personally consuming alcohol more heavily (Lintonen and Konu, 2004, Perkins, 2007, Perkins and Wechsler, 1996). However, the role of descriptive norms in relation to NMUPS is not well understood. Furthermore, only few studies have investigated the role of perceived injunctive norms in predicting personal substance use behavior. There is some indication that perceived peer approval of alcohol (McAlaney et al., 2015), tobacco (Pischke et al., 2015) and illicit substance use (Dempsey et al., 2016, Helmer et al., 2014) is associated with personal approval toward such substances. Neighbors et al. also suggested that an association between injunctive drinking norms of proximal reference groups and personal drinking exists (Neighbors et al., 2008). However, we are unaware of any studies focussing on associations between perceived NMUPS approval and personal NMUPS in student populations.

The objectives of this study were to describe NMUPS among students from seven European countries, to assess discrepancies between estimated peer and personal NMUPS behavior/approval and to determine whether perceptions of peer norms are associated with personal NMUPS behavior/approval.

Section snippets

Data

The ‘Social Norms Intervention for the prevention of Polydrug usE’ (SNIPE)- project was a cross- national study which included students from universities in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom. The project was funded by the European Commission (LS/2009-2010/DPIP/AG). The overall objective of SNIPE was to test the feasibility of a web-based personalised ‘social norms’-feedback intervention for substance use for European students of the respective

Results

The study included a total of 4482 university students (71% female). Participant numbers across countries varied from 1938 students in the Slovak Republic (43%) and 858 in Turkey (19%) to 504 in Germany (11%), 464 in Denmark (10%), 426 in Belgium (10%), 185 in Spain (4%) and 107 in the UK (2%). A detailed description of the sample is provided elsewhere (Helmer et al., 2014). Data on non-prescribed stimulant use/attitudes towards the use were available for 4433/4337 students.

Across all

Discussion

The present study investigated the personal and perceived use of non-prescribed stimulants to improve academic performance and the personal and perceived attitudes towards using those medications in university students from seven European countries. Study participants generally perceived the NMUPS of the majority of their peers to be higher than their personal use. In addition, the majority of students perceived their peers to be equally or more approving of NMUPS than themselves. The

Role of funding

Source: The Social Norms for the prevention of Polydrug usE (SNIPE) project was funded by the European Commission (LS/2009-2010/DPIP/AG). We declare no competing interests.

Contributors

SH planned and carried out the analyses, and wrote the manuscript. BV, GvH, RD, YA, FGG, FS, CS contributed to the design of the study, guided the data collection and revised the paper. CP and HZ participated in designing and coordinating the study as well as in performing the statistical analyses and writing and revising the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Jan-Philipp Köster for his assistance in the literature review for this paper.

References (40)

  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Nonmedical prescription stimulant use among college students: why we need to do something and what we need to do

    J. Addict. Dis.

    (2010)
  • A.D. Berkowitz

    The Social Norms Approach: Theory, Research, and Annotated. Bibliography

    (2004)
  • Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM)

    Methylphenidat auch für Erwachsene: BfArM erweitert Zulassung

    (2011)
  • B. Borsari et al.

    Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2003)
  • W.M. Compton et al.

    Abuse of prescription drugs and the risk of addiction

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2006)
  • A.D. DeSantis et al.

    Illicit use of prescription ADHD medications on a college campus: a multimethodological approach

    J. Am. Coll. Health

    (2008)
  • A.D. DeSantis et al.

    Illegal college ADHD stimulant distributors: characteristics and potential areas of intervention

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (2013)
  • R.C. Dempsey et al.

    Normative perceptions of cannabis use amongst European university students: associations between perceived peer use and peer attitudes with personal use and attitudes

    J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

    (2016)
  • P. Dietz et al.

    Randomized response estimates for the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in university students

    Pharmacotherapy

    (2013)
  • P. Eickenhorst et al.

    Neuroenhancement among German university students: motives, expectations, and relationship with psychoactive lifestyle drugs

    J. Psychoact. Drugs

    (2012)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Normative misperceptions of unhealthy snacking amongst 11- to 12-year-old secondary school students

      2021, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      These findings contribute to the social norms literature as no other study, to our knowledge, has explored the association between injunctive normative perceptions (perceptions about what others approve of) and personal attitude towards unhealthy snacking in this age group. These findings are in line with those reported for other health-related behaviours amongst older age groups (e.g. alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and other drug use) which have demonstrated an association between inflated perceptions about peers’ approval of an unhealthy behaviour and increased personal approval of the behaviour (Dempsey et al., 2016; Helmer et al., 2016). When testing the fourth hypothesis, the results indicated that girls who had positive personal attitudes towards reducing unhealthy snacking and inaccurately perceived peers to have a more positive attitude towards reducing unhealthy snacking, had a stronger intention to reduce unhealthy snacking themselves.

    • Students’ stimulant use for cognitive enhancement: A deliberate choice rather than an emotional response to a given situation

      2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent decades, however, these drugs have also gained popularity among college students, in particular because of the belief that they can help improve academic performance (Arria et al., 2017; Faraone et al., 2020). This had led to an increase in the number of people using these drugs for nonmedical purposes, meaning that they are not used in accordance with their prescription (Helmer et al., 2016). A recent review study of the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants found a prevalence rate ranging from 2.1% to 58.7%, depending on the definition, study design, and population (i.e., college students or others) (2020).

    • Personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards use of non-prescribed prescription sedatives and sleeping pills among university students in seven European countries

      2018, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our study, an association between perceived injunctive norms of peers and students' personal approval of using NPPSSP was found for all countries participating in the SNIPE project, except for the UK, with its comparatively small sample size. The findings of this study align with previous observations that university students' exaggerated perceptions of peer norms also exist for prescription substances which are less commonly used and socially accepted than, for example alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis (Helmer et al., 2016; Kilmer et al., 2015; McCabe, 2008; Perkins et al., 1999; Sanders et al., 2014; Silvestri & Correia, 2016). Increased interest in the non-medical use of prescription drugs to the public and the media (Partridge et al., 2011) may create the impression that approving and using these substances is much more common than it is in reality (McCabe, 2008; Sanders et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Final trial registration number: DRKS00004375 on the ‘German Clinical Trials Register’.

    View full text