Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 170, 1 January 2017, Pages 32-36
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Short communication
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Cannabis Use Problems Identification Test among Chilean university students: A validation study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.032Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The Spanish version of CUPIT is a valuable screening tool for use among young people.

  • The Spanish CUPIT has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid screening tool.

  • It can classify cannabis users with a current and emergent cannabis use disorder.

  • Spanish CUPIT will allow health professional taking preventive and intervention action.

Abstract

Background

In Chile, concerns mount about escalating cannabis use. Thus, it is important to have tools for early identification of at-risk users. The Cannabis Use Problems Identification Test (CUPIT) is a useful screening tool, and the aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of its Spanish version among Chilean university students.

Methods

The CUPIT was translated into Spanish, pre-tested in a focus group (n = 8), and then tested through an online survey (n = 3798, 28% response rate). Of the 1061 respondents, 578 reported 12-month cannabis use. Internal reliability, internal structure, and concurrent validity (using the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test [CAST]) were obtained. Test–retest reliability was calculated (n = 150) at 3–4 weeks (30% of attrition rate). Discriminative validity was evaluated comparing CUPIT subscales and four DSM-IV diagnostic groups. Receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Test–retest Pearson correlation between total CUPIT scores of 0.90 (p < 0.001), and highly significant Kendall Tau-b coefficients for individual items (p < 0.001) indicated excellent reliability. Concordance between the CUPIT and CAST (Pearson correlation 0.73, p < 0.001) indicated good concurrent validity. ANOVA revealed significant differences in CUPIT scores between the four DSM-IV diagnostic groups (p < 0.001), indicative of good discriminative validity. ROC analysis (gold standard: DSM-IV abuse/dependence) yielded an AUC value of 0.72, indicating acceptable discriminative capability.

Conclusions

The Spanish CUPIT is reliable, valid, and accepted by the university population studied, and, thus, a potentially useful tool for identifying both problematic and at-risk users.

Introduction

In Europe last year, 16.6 million (13.3%) young adults aged 15–34 years reported cannabis use (EMCDDA, 2016). Recent Chilean surveys show consistently dramatic increases in 12-month cannabis use from 19.5% in 2011 to 30.6% in 2013 by secondary students (SENDA, 2013). Last year, cannabis use also increased in the general population, from 5.3% in 2010 to 13.5% in 2014 among 12–18-year-olds, and from 12.3% in 2010 to 24% in 2014 for 19–25-year-olds (SENDA, 2015).

Surveys among students of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC) showed that past-year cannabis use increased from 28% in 2011 to 46% in 2013. Perception of risks involved simultaneously decreased from 53.5% to 39.5% during that period (DAE, 2011, DAE, 2013)

There is much scientific evidence of the negative effects of cannabis use (Meier et al., 2012, Volkow et al., 2014, Volkow et al., 2016, Hall, 2015, Hall and Lynskey, 2016, Arria et al., 2016, Auer et al., 2016), especially in young people, who presented low risk perception (SENDA, 2013, DAE, 2013) and a low rate of seeking help (Caldeira et al., 2009). However, if not all users run the same risk, a screening instrument can facilitate timely targeted interventions to arrest progression to more serious physical and mental harm.

A small assortment of cannabis-specific screening instruments has been developed worldwide. These include the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT; Annaheim et al., 2008, Piontek et al., 2008) and its revised version, CUDIT-R (Adamson et al., 2010); the Cannabis Screening Inventory (MSI-X; Alexander and Leung, 2004) in the United States; the Problematic Cannabis Use Test (PUM; Piontek et al., 2008) in Poland; and the Adolescent Cannabis Problems Questionnaire (CPQ-A; Martin et al., 2006) and its version validated in Spain (Fernández-Artamendi et al., 2012). In Chile, the CAST (Legleye et al., 2015) has been used successfully to screen secondary students with past-year cannabis use for the risk of meeting criteria for cannabis use disorder (SENDA, 2013).

The CUPIT is a screening tool empirically developed by researchers from New Zealand (Bashford et al., 2010) for testing among users aged from 13 years. It identifies the frequency and intensity of cannabis use in the past year and in the past 3 months, cannabis-induced problems, the current risk of harm within the next 12 months, and a current disorder (Bashford et al., 2010). What distinguishes this instrument from other cannabis screening tests is its capability to classify both currently diagnosable and potentially problematic cannabis use (Bashford et al., 2010).

This instrument can be used as part of prevalence studies of drug use in university populations, where the identification of level of risk would enable preventive institutional interventions (Yap et al., 2012), such as: social norms campaigns (Dejong et al., 2006), aiming to reduce misperceptions about cannabis use and its associated risks (Turner et al., 2008), for targeted preventive interventions, using the instrument via online websites along with the delivery of personalized feedback (Larimer and Cronce, 2007, Palfai et al., 2014, Cronce and Larimer, 2011), and for the screening of non-consultant students, using brief motivational interventions (McCambridge et al., 2011) by trained professionals (Larimer and Cronce, 2007, Cronce and Larimer, 2011).

The validated CUPIT can make a valuable contribution because, besides CAST, no other cannabis screening instruments are validated nor available for use in Chile.

To have a Spanish version of this rapid and reliable tool for the identification of problematic and risky cannabis use, a validation project for the CUPIT was developed in 2013 at UC.

Section snippets

Procedure

First, permission to use the CUPIT was sought and given by the principal CUPIT developer (Dr. Bashford), who also agreed to collaborate.

The CUPIT comprises 16 questions in a Likert-type response format measure to identify three dimensions according to DSM-IV questions (APA, 2010) and ICD-10 (WHO, 2010) classifications: hazardous use (questions 1 and 2), using behavior/compulsive use/dependence (questions 3–10), and health and social problems (questions 11–16) (Bashford et al., 2010). Possible

Participants

The response rate for the survey was 28% (n = 1061), an acceptable rate for web surveys (Cook et al., 2000). Respondents reporting past-year cannabis use (n = 578) represented 54.5% of the total sample; 68.8% (n = 398) of these past-year cannabis users reported using in the past month. All participants were older than 17 years old (mean age = 21.3 years); 57.4% were males. The prevalence of 12-month cannabis use in this population is 46% (DAE, 2013).

Factor structure and internal consistency/reliability

The factorial structure of CUPIT was analyzed using

Discussion

The statistically significant association between all questions and for the risk categories provides evidence of the high reliability of the Spanish CUPIT. Concordance between the CUPIT and CAST indicated good concurrent validity. A significant difference in CUPIT scores between the four DSM-IV diagnostic groups was indicative of good discriminative validity.

According to the ROC analysis, the validated CUPIT has a good negative predictive value (NPV) of 74%, important for a screening

Author disclosures

The Student Health Center, “Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile” funded this research. The authors confirm that they had complete access to the study data supporting this publication and that they have no financial interests in any company or institution that might benefit from this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Vanessa Cantillano: research concept, design and redaction of the fist paper draft.

Lorena Contreras: review and comments on the first paper draft

Daniel Martínez contribution on the discussion section and comments on the first paper draft

Claudia Ramírez Literature review for the Introduction section

Carmiña Pons review and comments on the first paper draft

Institution: Prevention program in student‘s drug and alcohol use. Students’ Health Center. “Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile”

Paloma

Conflict of interest

The authors affirm that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank all students who participated in this study and the support of the authorities of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile of the work of the Student Health Center.

References (44)

  • T.P. Palfai et al.

    Web-based screening and brief intervention for student marijuana use in a university health center: pilot study to examine the implementation of eCHECKUP TO GO in different contexts

    Addict. Behav.

    (2014)
  • APA

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (2010)
  • D.E. Alexander et al.

    The Marijuana Screening Inventory (MSI-X): reliability, factor structure, and scoring criteria with a clinical sample

    Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse

    (2004)
  • B. Annaheim et al.

    How to screen for problematic cannabis use in population surveys: an evaluation of the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in a Swiss sample of adolescents and young adults

    Eur. Addict. Res.

    (2008)
  • R. Auer et al.

    Association between lifetime marijuana use and cognitive function in middle age: the coronary artery risk development in young Adults (CARDIA) Study

    JAMA Intern. Med.

    (2016)
  • J. Bashford et al.

    The Cannabis Use Problems Identification Test (CUPIT): Development, reliability, concurrent and predictive validity among adolescents and adults

    Addiction

    (2010)
  • C. Cook et al.

    A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys

    Educ. Psychol. Meas.

    (2000)
  • J.M. Cronce et al.

    Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking

    Alcohol Res. Health

    (2011)
  • DAE, 2011. IV Estudio sobre uso de tabaco, alcohol, fármacos y drogas en estudiantes de la Universidad Católica de...
  • DAE, 2013. V Estudio sobre uso de tabaco, alcohol, fármacos y drogas en estudiantes de la Universidad Católica de...
  • W. Dejong et al.

    A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking

    J. Stud. Alcohol

    (2006)
  • A. Donner et al.

    Sample size requirements for reliability studies

    Stat. Med.

    (1987)
  • View full text