Short communicationPsychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Cannabis Use Problems Identification Test among Chilean university students: A validation study
Introduction
In Europe last year, 16.6 million (13.3%) young adults aged 15–34 years reported cannabis use (EMCDDA, 2016). Recent Chilean surveys show consistently dramatic increases in 12-month cannabis use from 19.5% in 2011 to 30.6% in 2013 by secondary students (SENDA, 2013). Last year, cannabis use also increased in the general population, from 5.3% in 2010 to 13.5% in 2014 among 12–18-year-olds, and from 12.3% in 2010 to 24% in 2014 for 19–25-year-olds (SENDA, 2015).
Surveys among students of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC) showed that past-year cannabis use increased from 28% in 2011 to 46% in 2013. Perception of risks involved simultaneously decreased from 53.5% to 39.5% during that period (DAE, 2011, DAE, 2013)
There is much scientific evidence of the negative effects of cannabis use (Meier et al., 2012, Volkow et al., 2014, Volkow et al., 2016, Hall, 2015, Hall and Lynskey, 2016, Arria et al., 2016, Auer et al., 2016), especially in young people, who presented low risk perception (SENDA, 2013, DAE, 2013) and a low rate of seeking help (Caldeira et al., 2009). However, if not all users run the same risk, a screening instrument can facilitate timely targeted interventions to arrest progression to more serious physical and mental harm.
A small assortment of cannabis-specific screening instruments has been developed worldwide. These include the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT; Annaheim et al., 2008, Piontek et al., 2008) and its revised version, CUDIT-R (Adamson et al., 2010); the Cannabis Screening Inventory (MSI-X; Alexander and Leung, 2004) in the United States; the Problematic Cannabis Use Test (PUM; Piontek et al., 2008) in Poland; and the Adolescent Cannabis Problems Questionnaire (CPQ-A; Martin et al., 2006) and its version validated in Spain (Fernández-Artamendi et al., 2012). In Chile, the CAST (Legleye et al., 2015) has been used successfully to screen secondary students with past-year cannabis use for the risk of meeting criteria for cannabis use disorder (SENDA, 2013).
The CUPIT is a screening tool empirically developed by researchers from New Zealand (Bashford et al., 2010) for testing among users aged from 13 years. It identifies the frequency and intensity of cannabis use in the past year and in the past 3 months, cannabis-induced problems, the current risk of harm within the next 12 months, and a current disorder (Bashford et al., 2010). What distinguishes this instrument from other cannabis screening tests is its capability to classify both currently diagnosable and potentially problematic cannabis use (Bashford et al., 2010).
This instrument can be used as part of prevalence studies of drug use in university populations, where the identification of level of risk would enable preventive institutional interventions (Yap et al., 2012), such as: social norms campaigns (Dejong et al., 2006), aiming to reduce misperceptions about cannabis use and its associated risks (Turner et al., 2008), for targeted preventive interventions, using the instrument via online websites along with the delivery of personalized feedback (Larimer and Cronce, 2007, Palfai et al., 2014, Cronce and Larimer, 2011), and for the screening of non-consultant students, using brief motivational interventions (McCambridge et al., 2011) by trained professionals (Larimer and Cronce, 2007, Cronce and Larimer, 2011).
The validated CUPIT can make a valuable contribution because, besides CAST, no other cannabis screening instruments are validated nor available for use in Chile.
To have a Spanish version of this rapid and reliable tool for the identification of problematic and risky cannabis use, a validation project for the CUPIT was developed in 2013 at UC.
Section snippets
Procedure
First, permission to use the CUPIT was sought and given by the principal CUPIT developer (Dr. Bashford), who also agreed to collaborate.
The CUPIT comprises 16 questions in a Likert-type response format measure to identify three dimensions according to DSM-IV questions (APA, 2010) and ICD-10 (WHO, 2010) classifications: hazardous use (questions 1 and 2), using behavior/compulsive use/dependence (questions 3–10), and health and social problems (questions 11–16) (Bashford et al., 2010). Possible
Participants
The response rate for the survey was 28% (n = 1061), an acceptable rate for web surveys (Cook et al., 2000). Respondents reporting past-year cannabis use (n = 578) represented 54.5% of the total sample; 68.8% (n = 398) of these past-year cannabis users reported using in the past month. All participants were older than 17 years old (mean age = 21.3 years); 57.4% were males. The prevalence of 12-month cannabis use in this population is 46% (DAE, 2013).
Factor structure and internal consistency/reliability
The factorial structure of CUPIT was analyzed using
Discussion
The statistically significant association between all questions and for the risk categories provides evidence of the high reliability of the Spanish CUPIT. Concordance between the CUPIT and CAST indicated good concurrent validity. A significant difference in CUPIT scores between the four DSM-IV diagnostic groups was indicative of good discriminative validity.
According to the ROC analysis, the validated CUPIT has a good negative predictive value (NPV) of 74%, important for a screening
Author disclosures
The Student Health Center, “Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile” funded this research. The authors confirm that they had complete access to the study data supporting this publication and that they have no financial interests in any company or institution that might benefit from this publication.
Authors’ contributions
Vanessa Cantillano: research concept, design and redaction of the fist paper draft.
Lorena Contreras: review and comments on the first paper draft
Daniel Martínez contribution on the discussion section and comments on the first paper draft
Claudia Ramírez Literature review for the Introduction section
Carmiña Pons review and comments on the first paper draft
Institution: Prevention program in student‘s drug and alcohol use. Students’ Health Center. “Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile”
Paloma
Conflict of interest
The authors affirm that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank all students who participated in this study and the support of the authorities of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile of the work of the Student Health Center.
References (44)
- et al.
An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: the cannabis use disorders identification test-revised (CUDIT-R)
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2010) - et al.
Marijuana use trajectories during college predict health outcomes nine years post-matriculation
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2016) - et al.
The occurrence of cannabis use disorders and other cannabis-related problems among first-year college students
Addict. Behav.
(2008) - et al.
College students rarely seek help despite serious substance use problems
J. Subst. Abuse Treat.
(2009) - et al.
‘Diagnostic orphans' among young adult cannabis users: persons who report dependence symptoms but do not meet diagnostic criteria
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2002) - et al.
Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999–2006
Addict. Behav.
(2007) - et al.
The adolescent cannabis problems questionnaire (CPQ-A): psychometric properties
Addict. Behav.
(2006) - et al.
Fidelity to motivational interviewing and subsequent cannabis cessation among adolescents
Addict. Behav.
(2011) Basic principles of ROC analysis
Semin. Nucl. Med.
(1978)- et al.
Development and validation of the diabetes adolescent problem solving questionnaire
Patient Educ. Couns.
(2014)
Web-based screening and brief intervention for student marijuana use in a university health center: pilot study to examine the implementation of eCHECKUP TO GO in different contexts
Addict. Behav.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
The Marijuana Screening Inventory (MSI-X): reliability, factor structure, and scoring criteria with a clinical sample
Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse
How to screen for problematic cannabis use in population surveys: an evaluation of the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in a Swiss sample of adolescents and young adults
Eur. Addict. Res.
Association between lifetime marijuana use and cognitive function in middle age: the coronary artery risk development in young Adults (CARDIA) Study
JAMA Intern. Med.
The Cannabis Use Problems Identification Test (CUPIT): Development, reliability, concurrent and predictive validity among adolescents and adults
Addiction
A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys
Educ. Psychol. Meas.
Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking
Alcohol Res. Health
A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking
J. Stud. Alcohol
Sample size requirements for reliability studies
Stat. Med.
Cited by (3)
Community conditions and the troublesome use of cannabis in young adults
2022, Metas de EnfermeriaValidation of the Spanish Version of the Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (S-MACQ)
2022, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction