Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 179, 1 October 2017, Pages 424-432
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Full length article
Trajectories of energy drink consumption and subsequent drug use during young adulthood

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Energy drink (ED) use prevalence fell significantly during ages 21–25 (63%–49%).

  • Half (51%) of the sample exhibited a Persistent 4-year trajectory of ED use.

  • Persistent ED use predicted increased risk for alcohol use disorder at age 25.

  • Both Persistent and Intermediate ED use predicted cocaine use and nonmedical stimulant use.

  • ED trajectory group membership predicted neither marijuana nor tobacco use at age 25.

Abstract

Background

Highly caffeinated energy drinks (EDs) are popular with adolescents and young adults, but longitudinal consumption patterns are poorly understood especially in relation to other substance use.

Methods

ED and other substance use were assessed annually (modal ages 21–25) among a sample (n = 1099) who were originally recruited as first-year college students (modal age 18). Trajectory groups were derived based on probability of past-year use during ages 21–24, and compared for possible differences in substance use outcomes at age 25, holding constant demographics, sensation-seeking, other caffeine consumption, and age 21 substance use.

Results

From age 21–25, ED consumption declined in both annual prevalence [62.5%wt to 49.1%wt (wt = weighted)] and frequency of use among consumers (35.2–26.3 days/year). Yet individuals exhibiting a Persistent trajectory (51.4%) of consumption outnumbered those with Non-Use (20.6%), Intermediate (17.4%), or Desisting (10.6%) trajectories. Age 25 cocaine use, nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NPS), and alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk were significantly associated with trajectory group membership, with Persistent and Intermediate groups exhibiting the highest risk for such outcomes, even accounting for prior substance use and other risk factors. Neither marijuana nor tobacco use were associated with group membership.

Conclusions

The typical pattern of ED consumption among this sample was sustained use throughout young adulthood. Such individuals appear to be at high risk for adverse substance use outcomes, and results suggest possible specificity regarding cocaine use and NPS, and AUD risk. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the connection between ED and substance use.

Introduction

Energy drinks (EDs) and shots are highly caffeinated products marketed primarily to adolescents and young adults (Heckman et al., 2010, Reissig et al., 2009). Although caffeine is the most commonly used drug in the world (Juliano et al., 2009), the introduction of EDs to the marketplace—and the rapid growth in their popularity—have taken caffeine use in a new direction (Branum et al., 2014, Packaged Facts, 2013). EDs differ from traditional caffeinated beverages by typically containing higher doses and concentrations of added caffeine in the form of sweet, flavored beverages or shots designed to be ingested quickly (Juliano et al., 2009, Reissig et al., 2009, Seifert et al., 2011). Marketed primarily to youth (Heckman et al., 2010), some branding is related to risky behaviors (e.g., Rehab, Full Throttle, AMP Energy) and their consumption has become intertwined with high-risk alcohol use (Arria et al., 2010, Arria et al., 2011a, O'Brien et al., 2013, O'Brien et al., 2008, Reissig et al., 2009).

Approximately one in three U.S. adolescents and young adults consume EDs and energy shots, with estimates as high as 50% for past-month use among college students (Arria et al., 2014, Miller, 2008b, Terry-McElrath et al., 2014, Velazquez et al., 2012, Woolsey et al., 2015). One study reported that 10% of college students consumed EDs at least weekly during the past year (Arria et al., 2011a). While White males are at highest risk for ED consumption among college students (Poulos and Pasch, 2015), other minority groups appear to be at risk among community samples (Arria et al., 2014, Berger et al., 2011).

Because of the high caffeine levels contained in most of these products, at least two major health concerns have been raised. First, acute cardiovascular effects have been discussed (Seifert et al., 2011); in particular, increased blood pressure (Franks et al., 2012, Phan and Shah, 2014, Shah et al., 2016), arrhythmias (Goldfarb et al., 2014), and increased platelet aggregation (Worthley et al., 2010) have been reported clinically. The second concern—and the focus of this paper—is the possible longer-term consequences of consuming highly caffeinated EDs, namely the increased potential for substance use and related problems. Significant cross-sectional associations between ED consumption and substance use (e.g., alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, nonmedical use of prescription drugs) have been reported (Arria et al., 2011a, Miller, 2008a, Skewes et al., 2013, Terry-McElrath et al., 2014, Trapp et al., 2014, Woolsey et al., 2014). Research has focused on the interrelationships between ED consumption and high-risk drinking, as well as the consequences thereof. Almost one-quarter of college students have mixed an ED with alcohol (O'Brien et al., 2008), and cross-sectional evidence links this behavior to increased risk for alcohol-related problems such as alcohol dose escalation and heavy drinking patterns, subjective increases in alcohol desires and expectancies, injuries, and sexual consequences (Arria et al., 2010; Ferré and O'Brien, 2011; Ferreira et al., 2013; Mallett et al., 2014; Marczinski et al., 2013; Miller, 2012; O'Brien et al., 2013; , 2008). We previously reported that ED consumption is associated with an increased risk for alcohol dependence and more frequent drunk driving, even after adjustment for family history, conduct disorder, other caffeine consumption, and sensation-seeking (Arria et al., 2016b, Arria et al., 2011a).

Other research has observed a relationship between EDs and illicit substance use. From two waves of data from the study that is the focus of the present analysis, college students who consumed EDs were twice as likely to initiate nonmedical prescription stimulant use one year later compared with students who did not consume EDs, controlling for risk factors and other caffeine consumption (Arria et al., 2010). Other studies have also observed cross-sectional associations between ED consumption and other drug use (Kelly and Prichard, 2016, Kumar et al., 2015, Miller, 2008a, Miller and Quigley, 2011, Terry-McElrath et al., 2014, Trapp et al., 2014, Woolsey et al., 2014, Woolsey et al., 2015). At least three potential mechanisms exist to explain the association. First, ED consumers and individuals who use illicit substances might share a propensity for risk-taking. Problem behavior theory [PBT (Donovan and Jessor, 1985, Jessor, 1987)] would predict that ED consumers engage in substance use because they share many of the same characteristics as individuals with heavy substance use involvement [e.g., sensation-seeking, conduct problems (Kristjansson et al., 2013)]. Such commonalities point to a “third factor” hypothesis to explain the association between ED consumption and substance use.

Second, opportunities to be exposed to both EDs and other substances might overlap with each other. The social development model (Catalano and Hawkins, 1996) informs our understanding of the complex interplay of risk factors that might lead to high-risk substance use—and perhaps ED consumption—in that personal vulnerability to developing a substance use disorder (SUD) operates in the context of environmentally-driven opportunities to use a substance. ED consumption might increase an individual’s interest in using illicit drugs (Reissig et al., 2009). If ED consumers are drawn to affiliate with each other, such a peer network might provide increased opportunities for and more accepting attitudes toward substance use.

Third, neurobiological evidence supports the possibility that frequent ED consumption might contribute to an increased risk for SUD due to caffeine’s ability to potentiate the addictive properties of other substances (Ferré, 2016). Laboratory studies have shown that caffeine enhances nicotine’s reinforcing and analgesic effects and potentiates the addictive properties of other stimulant drugs (Jones and Griffiths, 2003, O'Neill et al., 2015, Sigmon and Griffiths, 2011, Tanda and Goldberg, 2000). Furthermore, the rapid-onset stimulant effects of EDs—especially among younger consumers who have not yet developed tolerance to caffeine—might provoke some consumers to seek out similar or even more intense effects via other drugs (Reissig et al., 2009). Some have argued that the high doses of caffeine in EDs might accelerate the development of caffeine dependence, which in turn could predict other SUDs (Meredith et al., 2013). If ED consumption contributes independently to intensification of substance use patterns, after accounting for shared risk factors, then prevention efforts could be targeted at ED consumption as a novel risk factor for substance use.

The purpose of this study is fourfold: (1) to describe the prevalence and frequency of ED consumption among a young adult sample throughout a five-year interval (ages 21–25); (2) to identify subsets of individuals who consume EDs with distinct trajectories of such use during the first four years of that interval (ages 21–24); (3) to describe the pattern of ED consumption within each trajectory group; and (4) to examine the relationship between ED trajectory group membership and subsequent alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk and other substance use at age 25, after accounting for variables that reflect the known shared propensity for risk-taking among individuals who consume EDs and individuals who use other substances. By taking these risk factors into account, we will be able to isolate the unique effect, if any, of trajectories of ED use on substance use, even in the context of the commonalities in their respective risk factors. This approach allows for simultaneous evaluation of two competing hypotheses that are both empirically and theoretically grounded: (1) a “third factor” hypothesis derived from PBT, and (2) a possible contributory relationship operating through neurobiological mechanisms. This component of the model reflects our hypothesis that EDs uniquely contribute to risk for AUD and other substance use.

Section snippets

Study design

Participants were enrolled in an ongoing longitudinal study that began at college entry in 2004 at one large public university (see Arria et al., 2008, Vincent et al., 2012). Recruitment occurred in two stages, beginning with a pre-college survey during summer orientation (N = 3401; 89% response rate), followed by a two-hour baseline assessment with a sample of screened students (n = 1253; 87% response rate). To ensure adequate statistical power for analyzing longitudinal drug use patterns,

Overall prevalence and frequency

Annual prevalence of ED consumption ranged from 62.5%wt (wt = statistically weighted to reflect the general population of incoming students at the home university) at modal age 21 to 49.1%wt at modal age 25 (see Table 1). Individuals with infrequent past-year consumption patterns (≥1 days and <12 days) consistently comprised about one-quarter of the sample in any given year (range 25.6%wt to 26.7%wt), whereas frequent (≥52 days) consumers declined from 11.7%wt to 5.9%wt and occasional (≥12 days and

Discussion

This study described longitudinal patterns in ED consumption among a young adult sample originally recruited as college students. Overall, higher-frequency use patterns (i.e., ≥52 days/year, and 12–51 days/year) declined with age, whereas infrequent use patterns maintained a stable prevalence at approximately 26%wt. Half the sample (51.4%) comprised a Persistent group in which the probability of ED consumption remained at or above 87% throughout the four-year interval studied.

Trajectory group

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts declared.

Role of funding source

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA14845 and R03DA037936, Dr. Arria, PI). The National Institute on Drug Abuse had no further role in the study design; in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

A.M. Arria and K.E. O’Grady contributed to the overall scientific direction of the project. A.M. Arria and K.M. Caldeira developed the manuscript. B.A. Bugbee and K.B. Vincent managed the literature searches and summaries of previous work. K.M. Caldeira and K.E. O’Grady performed the statistical analyses. K.B. Vincent and B.A. Bugbee managed the day-to-day operational aspects of data collection and supervised staff involved in data collection. All authors assisted with writing and approved the

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are extended to Maddie McGann, the interviewing team, and the participants.

References (71)

  • C.K. Suerken et al.

    Marijuana use trajectories and academic outcomes among college students

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2016)
  • G. Tanda et al.

    Alteration of the behavioral effects of nicotine by chronic caffeine exposure

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2000)
  • G.S.A. Trapp et al.

    Energy drink consumption among young Australian adults: associations with alcohol and illicit drug use

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2014)
  • C.E. Velazquez et al.

    Associations between energy drink consumption and alcohol use behaviors among college students

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2012)
  • M.I. Worthley et al.

    Detrimental effects of energy drink consumption on platelet and endothelial function

    Am. J. Med.

    (2010)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV

    (1994)
  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Drug exposure opportunities and use patterns among college students: results of a longitudinal prospective cohort study

    Subst. Abus.

    (2008)
  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Increased alcohol consumption, nonmedical prescription drug use, and illicit drug use are associated with energy drink consumption among college students

    J. Addict. Med.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Energy drink consumption and increased risk for alcohol dependence

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2011)
  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Evidence and knowledge gaps for the association between energy drink use and high-risk behaviors among adolescents and young adults

    Nutr. Rev.

    (2014)
  • A.M. Arria et al.

    Energy drink use patterns among young adults: associations with drunk driving

    Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.

    (2016)
  • Arria, A.M., Caldeira, K.M., Allen, H.K., Bugbee, B.A., Vincent, K.B., O'Grady, K.E., in press Prevalence and incidence...
  • A.M. Branum et al.

    Trends in caffeine intake among US children and adolescents

    Pediatrics

    (2014)
  • K.M. Caldeira et al.

    Cigarette smoking among college students: longitudinal trajectories and health outcomes

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2012)
  • R. Catalano et al.

    The social development model: a theory of antisocial behavior

  • O. Cauli et al.

    Caffeine and the dopaminergic system

    Behav. Pharmacol.

    (2005)
  • Code of Federal Regulations

    21CFR182.1180

    (2012)
  • J.E. Donovan et al.

    Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood

    J Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1985)
  • B.J. Falls et al.

    The association between early conduct problems and early marijuana use in college students

    J. Child Adolesc. Subst. Abuse

    (2011)
  • S. Ferré et al.

    Alcohol and caffeine: the perfect storm

    J. Caffeine Res.

    (2011)
  • S. Ferré

    Mechanisms of the psychostimulant effects of caffeine: implications for substance use disorders

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (2016)
  • A.M. Franks et al.

    Comparison of the effects of energy drink versus caffeine supplementation on indices of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure

    Ann. Pharmacother.

    (2012)
  • M.A. Heckman et al.

    Energy drinks: an assessment of their market size, consumer demographics, ingredient profile, functionality, and regulations in the United States

    Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.

    (2010)
  • R. Hingson et al.

    Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24: Changes from 1998 to 2001

    Annu. Rev. Public Health

    (2005)
  • K.M. Jackson et al.

    Conjoint developmental trajectories of young adult alcohol and tobacco use

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Energy drink consumption and the perceived risk and disapproval of drugs: Monitoring the Future, 2010–2016

      2018, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      It also appears that energy drinks are associated with greater hard drug use, and this effect appears to be partially mediated by soft drug use (Leal and Jackson, 2017). Despite these findings, additional studies examining the process by which energy drink consumption and drug use are linked are sorely needed (Arria and O’Brien, 2011; Arria et al., 2017b). One potentially useful set of explanations of this association are substance use attitudes and perceptions.

    • The role of nutrition in addiction recovery: What we know and what we don’t

      2018, The Assessment and Treatment of Addiction: Best Practices and New Frontiers
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text