Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 188, 1 July 2018, Pages 356-363
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Full length article
Adolescent dual-product users: Acquisition and situational use of cigarettes and cigars

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Youth reported acquiring cigarettes and cigars in similar ways.

  • Cigarettes were more likely to be used in solitary situations compared to cigars.

  • Differences in acquisition and situational use exist among user subgroups.

Abstract

Background

Little is known about how adolescents who smoke both cigarettes and cigar products obtain and use these products. This study sought to explore cigarette and cigar acquisition and situational use among high school smokers.

Methods

Data are drawn from the 2011 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Analysis was limited to youth who smoke cigarettes as well as cigars, cigarillos, and little cigars (CCLC) in the past month (N = 649). Consumption of both products was calculated and used to create four subtypes of users based on high or low use of each product (Dual High, Dual Low, High CCLC/Low Cigarette, and Low CCLC/High Cigarette users). Current users were asked to identify situations in which they use cigarettes and CCLCs and ways in which they obtain these products. Data were analyzed overall and by user subtype.

Results

Youth reported acquiring cigarettes and CCLC in similar ways, although youth were more likely to take cigarettes from family members than CCLC (11.1% vs. 4.8%). Several differences were observed between cigarettes and CCLC for situational use. While both products are frequently used in social situations (e.g., with friends), cigarettes were more likely to be used in solitary situations (e.g., before bed). Further, significant differences were observed among the four user subtypes.

Conclusions

Study results highlight important, nuanced differences regarding how young multi-tobacco users obtain and the situational use of such products. Importantly, these findings vary by user subtype, informing future interventions to prevent and reduce smoking among the most vulnerable subgroups of youth.

Introduction

Rates of cigarette and cigar, cigarillo, and little cigar (CCLC) use have been declining over the last two decades among adolescents, and rates of current use of both products among high school students are similar, with 10.8% reporting cigarette use and 10.3% for CCLC (Kann et al., 2016). Further, 43.0% of adolescents (12–17 years old) who currently use tobacco report using more than one tobacco product. Cigarette and cigarillo use is the second most common combination of tobacco products for 10.1% of adolescent users of multiple types of tobacco; among multiple tobacco product users, 14% of youth and 22% of adults report using cigarettes with another cigar product (Kasza et al., 2017). Among adults, dual cigarette and CCLC users are more likely to be male, young adults (18–29), non-Hispanic Black, and have lower education levels (Cohn et al., 2015; Richardson et al., 2012). Adult dual cigarette and CCLC users report more symptoms of nicotine dependence than cigarette-only users (Rostron et al., 2016), prompting concern for increased risk of dependence among adolescents reporting dual cigarette and CCLC use. Notably, a significant number of adolescent smokers are using multiple products during adolescence, and earlier age of tobacco initiation is associated with an increased likelihood of being a multiple product user (Soneji et al., 2014). Additional research is needed to inform tobacco control strategies inclusive of CCLC use (Symm et al., 2005) to prevent and reduce smoking among youth, particularly with the extension of the US Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory authority to all tobacco products, including CCLC (Food and Drug Administration, 2016).

In a previous study, we found that the acquisition and use of CCLCs is similar to that of cigarettes as described in other research (Acosta et al., 2008; Castrucci et al., 2002; Hahn et al., 1990; Kaestle, 2009; Proctor et al., 2012; Seo and Huang, 2012; Sussman et al., 1993; Trapl et al., 2016b) with most adolescents, regardless of gender, race, and ethnicity purchasing their own CCLC and using them in social situations (Trapl et al., 2016b). Differences among subgroups were found in sharing and solitary use of CCLCs; females were more likely to share and youth identifying as black or Hispanic were more likely to smoke in solitary situations (Trapl et al., 2016b).

Many youths use more than one tobacco product. Adolescent users of more than one tobacco product are more likely than single product users to think that their close friends use cigarettes, hookah, and cigars as well as to report they would date someone who used these products (Cooper et al., 2016). Additionally, there are differences in the acquisition and use patterns of single product CCLC users and those who use both CCLC and cigarettes; dual users of CCLC and cigarettes are more likely to use in solitary situations as well as buy and take CCLC compared to CCLC-only users (Trapl et al., 2016b). However, we do not know if dual users are smoking CCLCs and cigarettes in different situations or acquiring each product in different ways, information that could provide additional evidence to inform prevention strategies.

The empirical literature has demonstrated that amount of tobacco consumption is related to smoking patterns, motivations, quitting behaviors, and dependence. While the definition of a light smoker has varied across studies, there are differences demonstrated in the literature between intermittent/light and daily cigarette smokers (Coggins et al., 2009; Tindle and Shiffman, 2011). In their review of studies on intermittent/light smokers, Coggins and colleagues found that smoking behavior of intermittent/light smokers is motivated by positive reinforcement and related to relaxation and socialization (Coggins et al., 2009). Intermittent cigarette smokers are more likely to try quitting than daily smokers, but most are not successful in their quit attempt (Tindle and Shiffman, 2011); in addition, they also tend to demonstrate lower nicotine dependence (Coggins et al., 2009). While research has focused on categorization of an intermittent/light smoker in terms of cigarette use, multiple product users may also be at risk for nicotine dependence even with low cigarette use (Husten, 2009). Moreover, the varying definitions of dual use and different use frequencies further complicate associated risk profiles (Klesges et al., 2011).

A growing body of research has highlighted the trend of dual use of cigarettes and cigars among adolescents, and there is limited understanding of acquisition and situational smoking patterns among this group. Further, given the variation noted above in consumption patterns and correlates, it is unclear how levels of cigarette and CCLC consumption may be associated with unique patterns of acquisition and situational use. Understanding acquisition and situational use among dual product users while taking into account consumption how it varies by demographic characteristics, will inform strategies to reduce adolescent tobacco use, initiation, and potentially address cessation.

Given the rise of dual use of tobacco products and opportunities presented by the FDA’s recent regulatory authority of CCLC (Food and Drug Administration, 2016), understanding the situational use and access patterns of dual users could inform strategies to prevent and reduce adolescent CCLC use. Thus, this study focuses on a sample of high school youth who identified as current users of both cigarettes and cigar products and compared their acquisition and situational use of each product. The sample was segmented into four user categories (i.e., Dual High, Dual Low, High CCLC/Low Cigarette, and Low CCLC/High Cigarette users) to understand if smoking patterns are associated with acquisition and situational use.

Section snippets

Study design and data collection

Data for this study were drawn from the 2011 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior Survey (CC-YRBS; Trapl and Frank, 2011); sampling methodology for the overall 2011 CC-YRBS can be found elsewhere (Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, 2012). Of the 54 high schools approached, 40 (74%) agreed to participate. A total of 15,844 students were eligible to complete the survey; 13,945 students participated. Questionnaires that failed quality control standards as established by the

Overall descriptives and demographic differences

As shown in Table 1, among the N = 649 high school youth identified as concurrent cigarette and CCLC smokers, 63.0% were male, 76.9% were White, and 37.5% reported high family affluence. Mean age reported for first cigarette was just over 13 years, while mean age for first CCLC was almost 13.5 years. A majority of youth (59.7%) reported using cigarettes as their first tobacco product. Among this group, a majority reported smoking less than five cigarettes per day, with roughly 20% reporting

Discussion

This study established that dual-user youths are not homogenous in their consumption of cigarettes and CCLC, and distinct patterns of product acquisition and situational use emerged. Notably, the majority of dual-using youth appear to consume lower amounts of both cigarettes and CCLC, access their tobacco in a limited number of ways, and use in mostly social situations. However, roughly a third of youth in our sample reported higher consumption of at least one tobacco product, with

Role of the funding source

This work was supported by the Ohio Department of Health/Federal Government, Bureau of Child and Family Health Services through the Cuyahoga County Board of Health's Child and Family Health Services Program; a Cooperative Agreement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant number 1-U48-DP-001930); and a Mentored Research Scientist Development Award to Promote Diversity (K01CA148789, CSF). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent

Contributors

All authors have approved the final article. Erika S. Trapl obtained funding for the data collection; is responsible for the conception, design, and acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; and drafting and revision of the manuscript. Sarah J. Koopman Gonzalez and Craig S. Fryer participated in interpretation of data and drafting and revision of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the Little Cigar Research Working Group at the Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods at Case Western Reserve University for their feedback on the results of this study. We would also like to thank Farren B.S. Briggs, PhD, for his statistical consultation.

References (40)

  • C.R.E. Coggins et al.

    Light and intermittent cigarette smokers: a review (1989–2009)

    Psychopharmacology

    (2009)
  • A. Cohn et al.

    The other combustible products: prevalence and correlates of little cigar/cigarillo use among cigarette smokers

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2015)
  • M. Cooper et al.

    Social norms, perceptions and dual/poly tobacco use among Texas Youth

    Am. J. Health Behav.

    (2016)
  • C.G. Corey et al.

    Cigar smoking among U.S. students: reported use after adding brands to survey items

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2014)
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

    Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for (No. Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0189), Federal Register

    (2016)
  • C.G. Husten

    How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter?

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2009)
  • L. Kann et al.

    Youth risk behavior surveillance United States, 2015

    MMWR Surveill. Summ.

    (2016)
  • K.A. Kasza et al.

    Tobacco-product use by adults and youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014

    N. Engl. J. Med

    (2017)
  • B.A. King et al.

    Flavored cigar smoking among U.S. Adults: findings from the 2009-2010 national adult tobacco survey

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2013)
  • R.C. Klesges et al.

    Impact of differing definitions of dual tobacco use: implications for studying dual use and a call for operational definitions

    Nicotine Tob. Res.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text